Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29849504›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2018

Michelle Lobchuk, Lisa Hoplock, Gayle Halas, Christina West, Cheryl Dika, Wilma Schroeder, Terri Ashcroft, Kathleen Chambers Clouston, Jocelyne Lemoine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle Lobchuk1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1893-5010
Lisa Hoplock1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.
Gayle Halas2Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, P228-770, Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W3 Canada.
Christina West1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.
Cheryl Dika1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.
Wilma Schroeder3Red River College, Nursing, 2055 Notre Dame Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3H 0J9 Canada.
Terri Ashcroft1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.
Kathleen Chambers Clouston4Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, 770 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W3 Canada.
Jocelyne Lemoine1Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Room 315 - 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada.
University of Manitoba · CARed River College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle counseling is described as a "major breakthrough" in the control of chronic diseases. Counseling can be challenging to nurses due their lack of motivation to counsel, hesitancy to appear non-judgmental, lack of empathy, and lack of time. Nurses voice their need for more training in counseling communication skills. Our main objective was to engage in ongoing development and testing of a promising

methodsIn this randomized controlled pilot study, the full intervention (perspective-taking instructions, practice, and video-feedback) and partial intervention (video-feedback only) comprised 24 and 18 nursing students, respectively. Quantitative data were collected with a 10-item pre- and post-intervention clinical empathy tool, a one-item 'readiness to change' health risk behavior tool plus similarity ratings on students' empathic accuracy were calculated. Data were analyzed using Independent Samples t Tests and mixed model ANCOVA models. Students' and actors' evaluative responses toward the intervention phases were collected by handwritten notes, and analyzed using content analysis and constant comparison techniques.

resultsThe main finding was that students in the full intervention group reported greater clinical empathy in the post versus baseline condition. Students underestimated their clinical empathy in comparison to carers' reports in the post-condition. In both intervention groups, carers reported more readiness to change in the post-condition. Carers identified favorable and unfavorable

conclusions

Indexed as

CarersEducationEmpathyHealth risk behaviorNursing studentsVideo-feedback

Identifiers

PMID29849504
PMCPMC5968556
OpenAlexW2807510571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.