Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29849229›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2017

Clinicoradiologic features distinguish tumefactive multiple sclerosis from CNS neoplasms.

Xuling Lin, Wai-Yung Yu, Lishya Liauw, Russell Jude Chander, Weiling E Soon, Hwei Yee Lee, Kevin Tan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 'Killer' open ring in the brain.BMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tumefactive demyelination in older adults: A scoping review of published cases.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuling LinNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Wai-Yung YuNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Lishya LiauwNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Russell Jude ChanderNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Weiling E SoonNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Hwei Yee LeeNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Kevin TanNational Neuroscience Institute (XL, W-YY, LL, CRJ, WES, KT); and Tan Tock Seng Hospital (HYL), Singapore.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited data to guide clinicians in differentiating tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) from CNS neoplasms. Identifying distinguishing features will inform diagnosis and management and avoid unnecessary diagnostic biopsy. Our study aimed to determine the clinical and radiologic features that differentiate TMS from glioma and CNS lymphoma (CNSL) in patients who present with tumefactive lesions.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients with tumefactive lesions and histologically proven or clinically diagnosed TMS, glioma, or CNSL at our tertiary center from 1999 to 2012. Two independent blinded neuroradiologists rated MRI brain scans at presentation. We correlated patients' demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data to final diagnosis.

resultsA total of 133 patients (10 TMS, 85 glioma, 38 CNSL) were analyzed. Patients with TMS were younger and a greater proportion were women. Presenting symptoms did not distinguish between diagnoses. TMS lesions were smaller compared to glioma and CNSL, had no or mild mass effect, and were always associated with contrast enhancement. Radiologic features that were more frequent in TMS lesions were incomplete rim (open-ring) enhancement, incomplete peripheral diffusion restriction, and mixed T2 signal and CT hypoattenuation of MRI-enhancing components (all

conclusionsRadiologic features but not presenting symptoms are useful in distinguishing TMS from CNS neoplasms.

Identifiers

PMID29849229
PMCPMC5964866
OpenAlexW2547251840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.