ArticleNature2018
Rapid recovery of life at ground zero of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.
Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Morphological disparity across the K-Pg boundary in mollusk shells: A theoretical morphology approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Night lizards survived the Cretaceous-Palaeogene mass extinction near the asteroid impact.Biology letters · 2025Article
- ProlongedNature communications · 2025Article
- The evolution of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis and host-plant switches are the main drivers for diversification of Amanitaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota).BMC biology · 2024Article
- Life before impact in the Chicxulub area: unique marine ichnological signatures preserved in crater suevite.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Recognizing megatsunamis in Mediterranean deep sea sediments based on the massive deposits of the 365 CE Crete event.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Ecosystem function after the K/Pg extinction: decoupling of marine carbon pump and diversity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Globally distributed iridium layer preserved within the Chicxulub impact structure.Science advances · 2021Article
- Shaping of the Present-Day Deep Biosphere at Chicxulub by the Impact Catastrophe That Ended the Cretaceous.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Organic matter from the Chicxulub crater exacerbated the K-Pg impact winter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene.BMC plant biology · 2020Review
- Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Probing the hydrothermal system of the Chicxulub impact crater.Science advances · 2020Article
- Earth's Impact Events Through Geologic Time: A List of Recommended Ages for Terrestrial Impact Structures and Deposits.Astrobiology · 2020Article
- Paleocene-Eocene palynomorphs from the Chicxulub impact crater, Mexico. Part 2: angiosperm pollen.Palynology. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists · 2020Article
- Schizasterid Heart Urchins Host Microorganisms in a Digestive Symbiosis of Mesozoic Origin.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The first day of the Cenozoic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction.Nature communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Cretaceous/Palaeogene mass extinction eradicated 76% of species on Earth
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.