Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29848804›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

3D bioprinter applied picosecond pulsed electric fields for targeted manipulation of proliferation and lineage specific gene expression in neural stem cells.

Ross A Petrella, Peter A Mollica, Martina Zamponi, John A Reid, Shu Xiao, Robert D Bruno, Patrick C Sachs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ross A PetrellaFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2760-0084
Peter A MollicaDepartment of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0621-2819
Martina ZamponiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9154-1667
John A ReidDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2989-1292
Shu XiaoFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0375-8373
Robert D BrunoDepartment of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-9478
Patrick C SachsDepartment of Medical Diagnostic and Translational Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0871-6789
Old Dominion University · USSentara Norfolk General Hospital · US

Funding

Picosecond pulse technology for non-invasive electrostimulationR21EB016912 · NIBIB · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI PAKHOMOV, ANDREI G, XIAO, SHU · 2014 to 2015
$393k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePicosecond pulse electric fields (psPEF) have the potential to elicit functional changes in mammalian cells in a non-contact manner. Such electro-manipulation of pluripotent and multipotent cells could be a tool in both neural interface and tissue engineering. Here, we describe the potential of psPEF in directing neural stem cells (NSCs) gene expression, metabolism, and proliferation. As a comparison mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were also tested. APPROACH: A psPEF electrode was anchored on a customized commercially available 3D printer, which allowed us to deliver pulses with high spatial precision and systematically control the electrode position in three-axes. When the electrodes are continuously energized and their position is shifted by the 3D printer, large numbers of cells on a surface can be exposed to a uniform psPEF. With two electric field strengths (20 and 40 kV cm MAIN

resultsAnalysis revealed both NSCs and MSCs showed no significant cell death after treatments. Both cell types exhibited an increased metabolic reduction; however, the response rate for MSCs was sensitive to the change of electric field strength, but for NSCs, it appeared independent of electric field strength. The change in proliferation rate was cell-type specific. MSCs underwent no significant change in proliferation whereas NSCs exhibited an electric field dependent response with the higher electric field producing less proliferation. Further, NSCs showed an upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) after 24 h to 40 kV cm SIGNIFICANCE: Changes in cell metabolism, proliferation, and gene expression after picosecond pulsed electric field exposure are cell type specific.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationElectromagnetic FieldsPrinting, Three-DimensionalAstrocytesCell DeathCell LineageElectrodesGene ExpressionGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

Identifiers

PMID29848804
PMCPMC6145167
OpenAlexW2805545188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.