ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018
Labile haemoglobin as a glycaemic biomarker for patient-specific monitoring of diabetes: mathematical modelling approach.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus constitutes a major health problem and its clinical presentation and progression may vary considerably. A number of standardized diagnostic and monitoring tests are currently used for diabetes. They are based on measuring either plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin or both. Their main goal is to assess the average blood glucose concentration. There are several sources of interference that can lead to discordances between measured plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin levels. These include haemoglobinopathies, conditions associated with increased red blood cell turnover or the administration of some therapies, to name a few. Therefore, there is a need to provide new diagnostic tools for diabetes that employ clinically accessible biomarkers which, at the same time, can offer additional information allowing us to detect possible conflicting cases and to yield more reliable evaluations of the average blood glucose level concentration. We put forward a biomathematical model to describe the kinetics of two patient-specific glycaemic biomarkers to track the emergence and evolution of diabetes: glycated haemoglobin and its labile fraction. Our method incorporates erythrocyte age distribution and utilizes a large cohort of clinical data from blood tests to support its usefulness for diabetes monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.