Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29848563›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018

Enhanced Recovery of Fastidious Organisms from Urine Culture in the Setting of Total Laboratory Automation.

William Lainhart, C A Burnham

Abstract readComparative StudyLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reducing the time between inoculation and first-read of urine cultures using total lab automation significantly reduces turn-around-time of positive culture results with minimal loss of first-read sensitivity.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Impact of total laboratory automation on workflow and specimen processing time for culture of urine specimens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William LainhartWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-6737
C A BurnhamWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA cburnham@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-840X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesChlamydia trachomatisDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUrinecontinuous incubationculturefastidious organismsNeisseria gonorrhoeaetotal laboratory automationurine

Identifiers

PMID29848563
PMCPMC6062796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.