Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29848391›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

The long and winding road: the journey taken by headache sufferers in search of help.

Paul T G Davies, Russell J M Lane, Theresa Astbury, Manuela Fontebasso, Jill Murphy, Manjit Matharu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Headache in the neurology clinic: a 2-year audit.Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul T G Davies1Department of Neurology,Northampton General Hospital,Billing Road,Northampton,UK.
Russell J M Lane4Department of Neurology,Ashford Hospital,Middlesex,UK.
Theresa Astbury1Department of Neurology,Northampton General Hospital,Billing Road,Northampton,UK.
Manuela Fontebasso5York Headache Clinic (York District Hospital),York,UK.
Jill Murphy5York Headache Clinic (York District Hospital),York,UK.
Manjit Matharu6The London Headache Group,National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery,Queen Square,London,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimTo outline the pathways a cohort of first attendees to our headache clinics had taken over the years in search of explanations and treatment for their headaches. To establish a greater awareness of the shortcomings and failures in their medical journey in the hope that better headache management will emerge in primary care.

backgroundAt first attendance in primary care most headache sufferers will not receive a firm diagnosis. Treatments provided are often ineffective and so many patients embark on a somewhat random self-made journey searching for a remedy. If they reach a Headache Clinic the most common diagnoses are 'chronic migraine' and 'medication overuse headache'. They are either no better or worse than when their headaches first started despite their efforts.

methodWe undertook a prospective questionnaire-based study of over 200 patients on first attendance at each of our headache clinics, three based in District General Hospitals and one in a tertiary referral centre. We documented the patients' headache characteristics, the 'burden' of their headaches, functional handicap and the financial costs incurred seeking help before referral. We also documented what our patients understood about their headache disorder and the treatments previously tried.FindingsMost patients had not been given a formal diagnosis in primary care and many remained unconvinced of the benign nature of their headache problem and wanted further investigations. A few had sought help from headache charities. Many had unrealistic attitudes to their problem and medication overuse was rife. A few patients had been offered triptans in primary care. Key deficiencies in the primary care management of these patients included failure to provide a formal headache diagnosis, inadequate understanding of the nature and mechanism of headaches and failure to follow a resilient management strategy. We provide a more effective management pathway in primary care.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCohort StudiesHeadache DisordersHumansPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomchronic migraineheadache clinicheadache managementheadache pathwaymedication overuse headache

Identifiers

PMID29848391
PMCPMC6476391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.