Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29848364›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Qi-Hong Chen, Hua-Ling Wang, Lei Liu, Jun Shao, Jiangqian Yu, Rui-Qiang Zheng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04155489 (The Impact of Perioperative Restrictive Transfusion on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04155489 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Perioperative Restrictive Transfusion on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorGangnam Severance HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled148ConditionsPOCD, Anemia, TransfusionArmsblood transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Post-Embolization Hemoglobin Changes: When to Consider Re-intervention.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation for Perioperative Blood Transfusion during Major Abdominal Procedures in a Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Observation Cohort Study.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qi-Hong ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China.
Hua-Ling WangDepartment of Cardiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China. 18051063567@163.com.
Lei LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China.
Jun ShaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China.
Jiangqian YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Qiang ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital; Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 Nantong West Road, Yangzhou, 225001, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent QNRC2016317National Natural Science Foundations of China 81670065Social Development Funds of Jiangsu Province BE2017691Social Development Funds of Yangzhou City YZ2017086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRestrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies remain controversial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic benefits of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

methodsWe identified randomized clinical trials through the 9th of December 2017 that investigated a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Individual patient data from each study were collected. Meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. A trial sequential analysis (TSA)-adjusted random-effects model was used to pool the results from the included studies for the primary outcomes.

resultsSeven trials involving a total of 8886 patients were included. The TSA evaluations suggested that this meta-analysis could draw firm negative results, and the data were sufficient. There was no evidence that the risk of 30-day mortality differed between the patients assigned to a restrictive blood cell transfusion strategy and a liberal transfusion strategy (odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.24; p = 0.87). Furthermore, the study suggested that the restrictive transfusion strategy was not associated with significant increases in pulmonary morbidity (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.34; p = 0.44), postoperative infection (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3; p = 0.58), acute kidney injury (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; p = 0.71), acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27; p = 0.78), or cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.30; p = 0.66).

conclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrates that the restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy was not inferior to the liberal strategy with respect to 30-day mortality, pulmonary morbidity, postoperative infection, cerebrovascular accidents, acute kidney injury, or acute myocardial infarction, and fewer red blood cells were transfused.

Indexed as

Bloodless Medical and Surgical ProceduresCardiac Surgical ProceduresErythrocyte TransfusionHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiac surgeryLiberal transfusion strategyMeta-analysesPrognosisRestrictive transfusion strategy

Identifiers

PMID29848364
PMCPMC5977455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.