Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29848109›Full record

ArticleCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2019

Non-invasive dural stimulation in mice: A novel preclinical model of migraine.

Carolina Christina Burgos-Vega, Lilyana D Quigley, Gabriela Trevisan Dos Santos, Flora Yan, Marina Asiedu, Blaine Jacobs, Marina Motina, Nida Safdar, Hayyan Yousuf, Amanda Avona and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolina Christina Burgos-Vega1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Lilyana D Quigley1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Gabriela Trevisan Dos Santos2 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.
Flora Yan1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Marina Asiedu1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Blaine Jacobs1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Marina Motina1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Nida Safdar1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Hayyan Yousuf1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Amanda Avona1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Theodore John Price1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Greg Dussor1 School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

Protease Activated Receptor Type 2 Targeting for Migraine PainR01NS098826 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI GREGORY O DUSSOR, Theodore J Price · 2017 to 2026
$3.4M
Meningeal prolactin signaling and female-selective migraine mechanismsR01NS104200 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI AKOPIAN, ARMEN N, DUSSOR, GREGORY O · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
The Role of ASICs in Migraine PathophysiologyR01NS072204 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI DUSSOR, GREGORY O · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Protease Activated Receptor Type 2 Targeting for Migraine PainR56NS098826 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI BOITANO, SCOTT, DUSSOR, GREGORY O · 2016 to 2016
$439k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072204NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098826NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104200NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS098826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is characterized by a collection of neurological symptoms in the absence of injury or damage. However, several common preclinical migraine models require significant damage to the skull to stimulate the dura mater, the likely source of afferent signaling leading to head pain. The goal of this study was to determine whether dural stimulation can be performed in mice using an injection that does not cause injury or damage.

methodsUsing mice, injections of stimuli were administered to the dura mater through the soft tissue at the intersection between the lambdoidal and sagittal sutures. This technique did not require a permanent cannula nor did it cause damage to the skull or dura. Following injection of noxious stimuli, migraine-like behaviors were measured including cutaneous allodynia and facial grimace. The retrograde tracer fluorogold was applied onto the dura using the same injection technique to label trigeminal ganglion cell bodies, which were then testing in vitro using patch-clamp electrophysiology.

resultsDural injection of allyl-isothiocyanate, low pH, interleukin-6, or inflammatory soup but not vehicles, led to cephalic/extracephalic allodynia. Facial grimace responses were also observed with allyl-isothiocyanate, pH 6.0, and interleukin-6. Stimulation with interleukin-6 causes priming to normally subthreshold pH 7.0 stimulation of the dura following resolution of the initial interleukin-6 behavior. Systemic injection of sumatriptan at the time of dural stimulation with inflammatory soup decreased the resulting cutaneous hypersensitivity. Trigeminal ganglion cell bodies retrogradely labeled from the dura had low pH-evoked currents similar to those generated by acid-sensing ion channels.

conclusionNon-invasive dural stimulation in mice can be used as a model of migraine in the absence of injury.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMigraine DisordersAnimalsDura MaterFemaleHyperalgesiaIrritantsMaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRIrritantsDuraheadacheinterleukinmeningesmigrainemouse modelprimingtrigeminal

Identifiers

PMID29848109
PMCPMC6499065
OpenAlexW2806717670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.