Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29847989›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2018

Inhalation of electronic cigarette aerosol induces reflex bronchoconstriction by activation of vagal bronchopulmonary C-fibers.

M Khosravi, R L Lin, L-Y Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaping-related lung disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M KhosraviDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center , Lexington, Kentucky.
R L LinDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center , Lexington, Kentucky.
L-Y LeeDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center , Lexington, Kentucky.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Role of TRPV1 in Airway Hypersensitivity Induced by InflammationR01HL096914 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LEE, LU-YUAN · 2009 to 2010
$703k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electronic cigarette (e-cig) has been suggested as a safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes. However, the health effects of e-cigs on the airways have not been fully investigated. Nicotine, the primary chemical constituent of the e-cig aerosol, has been shown to stimulate vagal bronchopulmonary C-fiber sensory nerves, which upon activation can elicit vigorous pulmonary defense reflexes, including airway constriction. In this study, we investigated the bronchomotor response to e-cig inhalation challenge in anesthetized guinea pigs and the mechanisms involved in regulating these responses. Our results showed that delivery of a single puff of e-cig aerosol into the lung triggered immediately a transient bronchoconstriction that sustained for >2 min. The increase in airway resistance was almost completely abolished by a pretreatment with either intravenous injection of atropine or inhalation of aerosolized lidocaine, suggesting that the bronchoconstriction was elicited by cholinergic reflex mechanism and stimulation of airway sensory nerves was probably involved. Indeed, electrophysiological recording further confirmed that inhalation of e-cig aerosol exerted a pronounced stimulatory effect on vagal bronchopulmonary C-fibers. These effects on airway resistance and bronchopulmonary C-fiber activity were absent when the e-cig aerosol containing zero nicotine was inhaled, indicating a critical role of nicotine. Furthermore, a pretreatment with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists by inhalation completely prevented the airway constriction evoked by e-cig aerosol inhalation. In conclusion, inhalation of a single puff of e-cig aerosol caused a transient bronchoconstriction that was mediated through cholinergic reflex and triggered by a stimulatory effect of nicotine on vagal bronchopulmonary C-fiber afferents.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdministration, InhalationAerosolsAirway ResistanceAnimalsBronchiBronchoconstrictionGuinea PigsMaleNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNicotineReflexRespiratory MechanicsVagus NerveAerosolsNicotineairwaybronchoconstrictionC-fiberelectronic cigarettenicotine

Identifiers

PMID29847989
PMCPMC6230882
OpenAlexW2805751353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.