Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29847674›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2018

Career Preferences and Perceptions of Cardiology Among US Internal Medicine Trainees: Factors Influencing Cardiology Career Choice.

Pamela S Douglas, Anne K Rzeszut, C Noel Bairey Merz, Claire S Duvernoy, Sandra J Lewis, Mary Norine Walsh, Linda Gillam, American College of Cardiology Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion and American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology Council

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
30.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cultivating a thriving environment for women in cardiology through leadership and inclusion.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Women in cardiovascular imaging: a call for action to address ongoing challenges.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Becoming a Parent During Cardiovascular Training.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Women in cardiology: narrowing the gender gap.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Anne K RzeszutAmerican College of Cardiology, Washington, DC.
C Noel Bairey MerzCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Claire S DuvernoyVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sandra J LewisOregon Clinic Cardiology, Portland.
Mary Norine WalshSt Vincent's Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Linda GillamMorristown Medical Center, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey.
American College of Cardiology Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion and American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology Council
American College of Cardiology · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDuke University · USMichigan Medicine · USMorristown Medical Center · USOregon Clinic · USSt. Vincent's Medical Center · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/12/3/29609British Heart Foundation RG/16/12/32451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Few data exist on internal medicine trainees' selection of cardiology training, although this is important for meeting future cardiology workforce needs. Objective: To discover trainees' professional development preferences and perceptions of cardiology, and their relationship to trainees' career choice. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed trainees to discover their professional development preferences and perceptions of cardiology and the influence of those perceptions and preferences on the trainees' career choices. Participants rated 38 professional development needs and 19 perceptions of cardiology. Data collection took place from February 2009, through January 2010. Data analysis was conducted from May 2017 to December 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable models were used to determine the association of demographics and survey responses with prospective career choice. Results: A total of 4850 trainees were contacted, and 1123 trainees (of whom 625 [55.7%] were men) in 198 residency programs completed surveys (23.1% response; mean [SD] age, 29.4 [3.5] years). Principal component analysis of survey responses resulted in 8-factor and 6-factor models. Professional development preferences in descending order of significance were stable hours, family friendliness, female friendliness, the availability of positive role models, financial benefits, professional challenges, patient focus, and the opportunity to have a stimulating career. The top perceptions of cardiology in descending order of significance were adverse job conditions, interference with family life, and a lack of diversity. Women and future noncardiologists valued work-life balance more highly and had more negative perceptions of cardiology than men or future cardiologists, who emphasized the professional advantages available in cardiology. Professional development factors and cardiology perceptions were strongly associated with a decision to pursue or avoid a career in cardiology in both men and women. Conclusions and Relevance: Alignment of cardiology culture with trainees' preferences and perceptions may assist efforts to ensure the continued attractiveness of cardiology careers and increase the diversity of the cardiology workforce.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCardiologyCareer ChoiceInternal MedicineAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrganizational CulturePhysicians, WomenSurveys and QuestionnairesWork-Life Balance

Identifiers

PMID29847674
PMCPMC6143073
OpenAlexW2806943833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.