Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29847638›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018

Non-Chlamydial Bacterial Infection and Progression of Conjunctival Scarring in Trachoma.

Victor H Hu, David Macleod, Patrick Massae, Isaac Afwamba, Helen A Weiss, David C W Mabey, Robin L Bailey, Matthew J Burton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Trachoma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor H HuLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
David MacleodLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Patrick MassaeKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Isaac AfwambaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Helen A WeissLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
David C W MabeyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Robin L BaileyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BurtonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 080741/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust 098481/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess whether non-chlamydial bacterial infection is associated with progression of trachomatous scarring in adults. Methods: This was a cohort study involving 800 participants in northern Tanzania who underwent clinical examination, photography, and conjunctival swab collection for microbiology over a 24-month period. Samples for microbiology were inoculated onto blood and chocolate agar, and Chlamydia trachomatis was detected by PCR. Progression was determined by comparison of baseline to 24-month photographs. Results: C. trachomatis was detected in only four participants at baseline. At 24 months, 617 participants (77.1%) were followed up. Of those seen at 24 months, 452 could be reliably assessed. Definite scarring progression (progressors) was seen in 345 (55.9%); there was no progression (nonprogressors) in 107 (17.3%). Using combined baseline and 12-month microbiology results, progressors had significantly higher levels of commensal and pathogenic bacterial organisms detected compared with nonprogressors. After adjusting for age, baseline scarring, and ethnicity, there was weak evidence (P = 0.07) that the bacteria category was associated with scarring progression (commensal organisms only: odds ratio [OR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 2.89; pathogenic organisms either with or without commensal: OR = 2.39; 95% CI: 1.10 to 5.16). Conclusion: The findings were consistent with the possibility that trachomatous scarring in adults is associated with the presence of non-chlamydial bacterial organisms, particularly pathogenic organisms. C. trachomatis was detected very infrequently and may not be an important factor in the pathogenesis of scarring progression in adults. This has implications for trachoma control programs, which largely concentrate on reducing C. trachomatis levels and transmission.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChlamydia trachomatisCicatrixConjunctivaDisease ProgressionDNA, BacterialEye Infections, BacterialFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTanzaniaTrachomaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29847638
PMCPMC5939686
OpenAlexW2799802541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.