Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29847342›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2018

Measuring and monitoring lean body mass in critical illness.

Wilhelmus G P M Looijaard, Jeroen Molinger, Peter J M Weijs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06168136 (Effects of Medical High Protein Nutrition on the Muscle Mass in Adult ICU Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06168136 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Medical High Protein Nutrition on the Muscle Mass in Adult ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsNutrient DeficiencyArmsprotein diet, Normal protein diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wilhelmus G P M LooijaardDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine.
Jeroen MolingerDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center.
Peter J M WeijsDepartment of Adult Intensive Care Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo help guide metabolic support in critical care, an understanding of patients' nutritional status and risk is important. Several methods to monitor lean body mass are increasingly used in the ICU and knowledge about their advantages and limitations is essential. RECENT

findingsComputed tomography scan analysis, musculoskeletal ultrasound, and bioelectrical impedance analysis are emerging as powerful clinical tools to monitor lean body mass during ICU stay. Accuracy, expertise, ease of use at the bedside, and costs are important factors which play a role in determining which method is most suitable. Exciting new research provides an insight into not only quantitative measurements, but also qualitative measurements of lean body mass, such as infiltration of adipose tissue and intramuscular glycogen storage. SUMMARY: Methods to monitor lean body mass in the ICU are under constant development, improving upon bedside usability and offering new modalities to measure. This provides clinicians with valuable markers with which to identify patients at high nutritional risk and to evaluate metabolic support during critical illness.

Indexed as

Critical CarePoint-of-Care TestingBody CompositionCritical IllnessElectric ImpedanceHumansMalnutritionMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentPractice Guidelines as TopicTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29847342
PMCPMC6039381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.