ArticleCA: a cancer journal for clinicians2018
From guideline to practice: New shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society.
Article in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2026Trial
- The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Trial
- Chronic Conditions and Racially Biased Healthcare Experiences Impact Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Racial/Ethnic Groups.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Shared Decision Making in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Limited English proficiency and reported receipt of colorectal cancer screening among adults 45-75 in 2019 and 2021.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Molecular methods for colorectal cancer screening: Progress with next-generation sequencing evolution.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Attitudes and Experiential Factors Associated with Completion of mt-sDNA Test Kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Colorectal cancer screening preferences among physicians and individuals at average risk: A discrete choice experiment.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Clinician based decision tool to guide recommended interval between colonoscopies: development and evaluation pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With Clinician Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Patients: Data From a National Survey.Preventing chronic disease · 2022Article
- Novel parameter based on lipid indicators ratio improves prognostic value of plasma lipid levels in resectable colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Race and Gender Differences in Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Guidelines Among Recently Diagnosed Colon Cancer Patients in an Urban Setting.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Cancer Screening Among Older Adults: a Geriatrician's Perspective on Breast, Cervical, Colon, Prostate, and Lung Cancer Screening.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- A risk prediction tool for colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study of patient and provider facilitators and barriers.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Patient and caregiver perspectives on guideline adherence: the case of endocrine and bone health recommendations for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
- SNHG15: a promising cancer-related long noncoding RNA.Cancer management and research · 2019Review
- Offering patients a choice for colorectal cancer screening: a quality improvement pilot study in a quality circle of primary care physicians.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.