Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846893›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts for overall survival in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Mudit Chowdhary, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Robert H Press, Jaymin Jhaveri, Zachary S Buchwald, Philip A Blumenfeld, Gaurav Marwaha, Aidnag Diaz, Dian Wang, Ross A Abrams and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a potential risk marker for febrile neutropenia (FN) in breast and ovarian cancer during first-cycle chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mudit ChowdharyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. mchowdharymd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-6077
Jeffrey M SwitchenkoBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert H PressDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jaymin JhaveriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zachary S BuchwaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Philip A BlumenfeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Gaurav MarwahaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Aidnag DiazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Dian WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ross A AbramsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, 500 South Paulina, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jeffrey J OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hui-Kuo G ShuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Walter J CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kirtesh R PatelDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. kirtesh@gmail.com.
Emory University · USRush University Medical Center · USSmilow Cancer Hospital · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a surrogate for systemic inflammatory response and its elevation has been shown to be a poor prognostic factor in various malignancies. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can induce a leukocyte-predominant inflammatory response. This study investigates the prognostic impact of post-SRS NLR in patients with brain metastases (BM).

methodsBM patients treated with SRS from 2003 to 2015 were retrospectively identified. NLR was calculated from the most recent full blood counts post-SRS. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence with competing risk for death, respectively.

results188 patients with 328 BM treated with SRS had calculable post-treatment NLR values. Of these, 51 (27.1%) had a NLR > 6. The overall median imaging follow-up was 13.2 (14.0 vs. 8.7 for NLR ≤ 6.0 vs. > 6.0) months. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were well balanced, except for lower rate of ECOG performance status 0 in the NLR > 6 cohort (33.3 vs. 44.2%, p = 0.026). NLR > 6 was associated with worse 1- and 2-year OS: 59.9 vs. 72.9% and 24.6 vs. 43.8%, (p = 0.028). On multivariable analysis, NLR > 6 (HR: 1.53; 95% CI 1.03-2.26, p = 0.036) and presence of extracranial metastases (HR: 1.90; 95% CI 1.30-2.78; p < 0.001) were significant predictors for worse OS. No association was seen with NLR and intracranial outcomes.

conclusionPost-treatment NLR, a potential marker for post-SRS inflammatory response, is inversely associated with OS in patients with BM. If prospectively validated, NLR is a simple, systemic marker that can be easily used to guide subsequent management.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsRadiosurgeryAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasesImmune responseNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioStereotactic radiosurgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID29846893
PMCPMC6126986
OpenAlexW2807307678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.