ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2018
Safety analysis of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with advanced kidney disease.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes between Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Dialysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Antithrombotic Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Outcomes associated with apixaban vs warfarin in patients with renal dysfunction.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Relevance of physicochemical properties and functional pharmacology data to predict the clinical safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Type 2 Diabetes, Atrial Fibrillation, and Direct Oral Anticoagulation.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticoagulation in patients with advanced kidney disease, defined as those with an eGFR < 25 mL/min, including patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, remains an area of controversy and debate. Due to safety concerns regarding the increased risk for bleeding in this population, these patients have been excluded from all large-scale, randomized controlled trials to date. Warfarin and apixaban are both FDA-approved for use in this population and although warfarin remains the anticoagulant of choice, apixaban use is steadily increasing. This review combines relevant literature to better understand the risk versus benefit of anticoagulation in patients with severe kidney disease as well as the safety of apixaban versus warfarin in this population. High rates of bleed were found among both anticoagulants in those with severe kidney disease, suggesting that the risk for bleed associated with anticoagulation may not outweigh the benefit of treatment. Apixaban was found to be superior in rates of major bleed in those with ESRD on HD and may be superior to warfarin in those with an eGFR < 25 mL/min. However, large-scale, randomized clinical trials are needed to validate these results. With the continued development of novel agents there may be superior alternatives to apixaban and warfarin in those with severe kidney disease in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.