Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846851›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2018

Molecular mechanism of synthetic pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in field isolates of Rhipicephalus microplus tick collected from a northern state of India.

Gaurav Nagar, Anil Kumar Sharma, Sachin Kumar, B C Saravanan, Rajesh Kumar, Suman Gupta, Satyanshu Kumar, Srikant Ghosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Acaricides Resistance in Ticks: Selection, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Mitigation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gaurav NagarDivision of Parasitology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Anil Kumar SharmaDivision of Parasitology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Sachin KumarDivision of Parasitology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
B C SaravananDivision of Parasitology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India.
Rajesh KumarDepartment of Agricultural Chemicals, ICAR- Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Suman GuptaDepartment of Agricultural Chemicals, ICAR- Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Satyanshu KumarICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Boriavi, Anand, Gujarat, 387310, India.
Srikant GhoshDivision of Parasitology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, 243122, India. sghoshtick@gmail.com.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INDirectorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research · IN

Funding

National Agricultural Science Fund , ICAR NASF/ABA-6015/2016-17/357National Agricultural Science Fund , ICAR NFBSFARA/BSA-4004/2013-14.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequently used chemical control method to manage Rhipicephalus microplus is limited by the emergence of resistance populations. Understanding of resistance mechanisms is essential to develop strategy for sustainable management. The present study was focused on working out the molecular mechanisms of resistance against synthetic pyrethroids (SPs) and organophosphates (OPs) in field isolates of R. microplus collected from six districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Adult immersion test with discriminating concentrations (AIT-DC) was used to determine resistance status of isolates to SPs (deltamethrin, cypermethrin) and OPs (diazinon, coumaphos). All the six isolates were found resistant to SPs with resistance factor (RF) of 2.9-58.6 and to one of the OP compounds, diazinon having RF of 3.5-13.7 but susceptible to coumaphos (RF < 1.4). Three R. microplus genes, viz. para-sodium channel domain II S4-5 linker, carboxylesterase (372 bp) and acetylcholinesterase 2 (1692 bp) were sequenced and compared with respective sequences of reference susceptible IVRI-I, reference OP resistant population (IVRI-III), IVRI-IV and multi-acaricide resistant population (IVRI-V) of R. microplus. A C190A mutation in the domain II S4-5 linker region of sodium channel gene leading to L64I amino acid substitution was detected in all six isolates. The G1120A mutation in the carboxylesterase gene could not be detected in any isolate. Five nucleotide substitutions viz., G138A, G889A, T1090A, C1234T and G1403A were identified in the acetylcholinesterase 2 gene leading to four amino acid substitutions. The findings of the study corroborate the role of mutation in sodium channel and acetylcholinesterase 2 genes in SP and OP resistance in this part of India.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsFemaleIndiaInsecticide ResistanceMutationOrganophosphatesPyrethrinsRhipicephalusSodium ChannelsAcaricidesAcetylcholinesteraseOrganophosphatesPyrethrinsSodium ChannelsAcetylcholinesterase 2ResistanceRhipicephalus microplusSodium channel S4-5 linker

Identifiers

PMID29846851
OpenAlexW2807012104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.