Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846797›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Structural brain changes versus self-report: machine-learning classification of chronic fatigue syndrome patients.

Landrew S Sevel, Jeff Boissoneault, Janelle E Letzen, Michael E Robinson, Roland Staud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recent research in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an evidence map.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Landrew S SevelDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jeff BoissoneaultDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Janelle E LetzenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michael E RobinsonDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Roland StaudDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100277, Gainesville, 2610-0277, FL, USA. staudr@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-2368

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Interdisciplinary Training in Biobehavioral Pain ResearchT32NS070201 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DONG, XINZHONG, SMITH, MICHAEL T · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Fatigue and Pain in Patients with ME/CFSR01NR014049 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI STAUD, ROLAND · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCATS NIH HHS UL TR000064NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS070201NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disorder associated with fatigue, pain, and structural/functional abnormalities seen during magnetic resonance brain imaging (MRI). Therefore, we evaluated the performance of structural MRI (sMRI) abnormalities in the classification of CFS patients versus healthy controls and compared it to machine learning (ML) classification based upon self-report (SR). Participants included 18 CFS patients and 15 healthy controls (HC). All subjects underwent T1-weighted sMRI and provided visual analogue-scale ratings of fatigue, pain intensity, anxiety, depression, anger, and sleep quality. sMRI data were segmented using FreeSurfer and 61 regions based on functional and structural abnormalities previously reported in patients with CFS. Classification was performed in RapidMiner using a linear support vector machine and bootstrap optimism correction. We compared ML classifiers based on (1) 61 a priori sMRI regional estimates and (2) SR ratings. The sMRI model achieved 79.58% classification accuracy. The SR (accuracy = 95.95%) outperformed both sMRI models. Estimates from multiple brain areas related to cognition, emotion, and memory contributed strongly to group classification. This is the first ML-based group classification of CFS. Our findings suggest that sMRI abnormalities are useful for discriminating CFS patients from HC, but SR ratings remain most effective in classification tasks.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSelf ReportAdultBrainFatigue Syndrome, ChronicFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalChronic fatigueClassificationGray matterMachine learningSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID29846797
PMCPMC6055066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.