Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846717›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2018

Temptations of friends: adolescents' neural and behavioral responses to best friends predict risky behavior.

Marigrace Ambrosia, Kristen L Eckstrand, Judith K Morgan, Nicholas B Allen, Neil P Jones, Lisa Sheeber, Jennifer S Silk, Erika E Forbes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Understanding the emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescence from a brain and behavioral developmental perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marigrace AmbrosiaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Kristen L EckstrandDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Judith K MorganDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Nicholas B AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Neil P JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Lisa SheeberOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Jennifer S SilkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Erika E ForbesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USOregon Research Institute · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Self-Regulation of Reward in AdolescenceR21DA033612 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FORBES, ERIKA E · 2011 to 2012
$366k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA033612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents are notorious for engaging in risky, reward-motivated behavior, and this behavior occurs most often in response to social reward, typically in the form of peer contexts involving intense positive affect. A combination of greater neural and behavioral sensitivity to peer positive affect may characterize adolescents who are especially likely to engage in risky behaviors. To test this hypothesis, we examined 50 adolescents' reciprocal positive affect and neural response to a personally relevant, ecologically valid pleasant stimulus: positive affect expressed by their best friend during a conversation about past and future rewarding mutual experiences. Participants were typically developing community adolescents (age 14-18 years, 48.6% female), and risky behavior was defined as a factor including domains such as substance use, sexual behavior and suicidality. Adolescents who engaged in more real-life risk-taking behavior exhibited either a combination of high reciprocal positive affect behavior and high response in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex-a region associated with impulsive sensation-seeking-or the opposite combination. Behavioral and neural sensitivity to peer influence could combine to contribute to pathways from peer influence to risky behavior, with implications for healthy development.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAffectBrain MappingFemaleFriendsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationPeer InfluencePrefrontal CortexRewardSexual BehaviorSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29846717
PMCPMC6007330
OpenAlexW2799758308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.