Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846693›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

Nomograms based on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of molecular subgrouping in medulloblastoma: results from a radiogenomics study of 111 patients.

Archya Dasgupta, Tejpal Gupta, Sona Pungavkar, Neelam Shirsat, Sridhar Epari, Girish Chinnaswamy, Abhishek Mahajan, Amit Janu, Aliasgar Moiyadi, Sadhana Kannan and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Archya DasguptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Tejpal GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sona PungavkarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis & Imaging, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
Neelam ShirsatNeuro-Oncology Lab, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sridhar EpariDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Girish ChinnaswamyDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Abhishek MahajanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Amit JanuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Aliasgar MoiyadiDepartment of Neurosurgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sadhana KannanDepartment of Clinical Trials Unit-Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Rahul KrishnatryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Goda Jayant SastriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Rakesh JalaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital/Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research, & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer · INGlobal Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Novel biological insights have led to consensus classification of medulloblastoma into 4 distinct molecular subgroups-wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. We aimed to predict molecular subgrouping in medulloblastoma based on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. Methods: A set of 19 MRI features were evaluated in 111 patients with histologic diagnosis of medulloblastoma for prediction of molecular subgrouping. MRI characteristics were correlated with molecular subgroups derived from tissue samples in 111 patients (WNT = 17, SHH = 44, Group 3 = 27, and Group 4 = 23). Multinomial logistic regression of imaging parameters was performed on a training cohort (TC) of 76 patients, representing two-thirds of randomly selected patients from each of 4 molecular subgroups, to generate binary nomograms. Validation of these nomograms was performed on the remaining 35 patients as the validation cohort (VC). Results: Medulloblastoma subgroups could be accurately predicted by preoperative MRI features in 74% of cases. Predictive accuracy was excellent for SHH (95%), acceptably high for Group 4 (78%), modest for Group 3 (56%) and worst for WNT (41%) subgroup medulloblastoma. SHH-specific nomogram was associated with excellent correlation between TC and VC, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.939 and 0.991, respectively. AUC for Group 4 was acceptable at 0.851 and 0.788 in TC and VC, respectively; however, these values were consistently suboptimal in WNT and Group 3 medulloblastoma. Conclusion: The predictive accuracy of MRI-based nomograms was excellent for SHH and encouraging for Group 4 medulloblastoma. Further work is needed for Group 3 and WNT-pathway medulloblastoma.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHedgehog ProteinsHumansMaleMedulloblastomaMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorHedgehog ProteinsSHH protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29846693
PMCPMC6303469
OpenAlexW2805966213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.