Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29846437›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2018

Development and validation of the WebAd-Q Questionnaire to monitor adherence to HIV therapy.

Felipe Campos Vale, Ernani Tiaraju de Santa-Helena, Maria Altenfelder Santos, Wania Maria do Espirito Santo Carvalho, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Caritas Relva Basso, Mariliza Henrique Silva, Ana Maroso Alves, Maria Ines Battistella Nemes

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felipe Campos ValePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ernani Tiaraju de Santa-HelenaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Blumenau, SC, Brasil.
Maria Altenfelder SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Wania Maria do Espirito Santo CarvalhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Paulo Rossi MenezesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Caritas Relva BassoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Mariliza Henrique SilvaCentro de Referência e Treinamento em DST e Aids do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ana Maroso AlvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Ines Battistella NemesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To present the development and validation of the WebAd-Q Questionnaire, a self-report instrument to monitor adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV/AIDS centers in Brazil. METHODS The WebAd-Q is an electronic questionnaire that has three questions about the use of antiretrovirals in the last week. It was constructed from interviews and focus groups with 38 patients. Its validity was tested in a study with a sample of 90 adult patients on antiretroviral therapy for at least three months. We used electronic monitoring bottles, pill counting, and self-report interview to compare adherence. The WebAd-Q was answered on the sixtieth day, twice, with at least one hour of interval. The viral load of the patients was obtained from the service records. We have analyzed the agreement between the answers to the WebAd-Q, the associations, and the correlations with viral load and performance compared to other measures of adherence. RESULTS Among the invited patients, 74 (82.2%) answered the WebAd-Q. No difficulties were reported to answer the questionnaire. The average answer time was 5 min 47 sec. The set of three questions of the WebAd-Q obtained agreement of 89.8%, with Kappa of 0.77 (95%CI 0.61-0.94). The non-adherence answers of the WebAd-Q were associated with detectable viral load. We obtained moderate viral load correlations with the non-adherence scale according to the WebAd-Q. For the three questions of the WebAd-Q, patients with non-adherence answers were also reported as less adherent according to the other measures of adherence. CONCLUSIONS The WebAd-Q answered all the issues considered relevant in the validation of questionnaires, was well understood by patients, was associated with viral load, and obtained good agreement and good performance compared to the other measures. The feasibility analysis of its implementation still depends on a national study on its applicability.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveDrug MonitoringSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV AgentsEducational StatusFemaleHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29846437
PMCPMC5963908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.