Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29845891›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2018

A Fluidic Culture Platform for Spatially Patterned Cell Growth, Differentiation, and Cocultures.

Josephine Lembong, Max J Lerman, Tami J Kingsbury, Curt I Civin, John P Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Scaffolding Biomaterials for 3D Cultivated Meat: Prospects and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. 3D-printed Bioreactors forInternational journal of bioprinting · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of surface functionalization strategies for 3D-printed polystyrene constructs.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josephine Lembong1 Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Max J Lerman2 NIH Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Tami J Kingsbury5 Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Curt I Civin5 Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
John P Fisher1 Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FISHER, JOHN P, MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell cultures within perfusion bioreactors, while efficient in obtaining cell numbers, often lack the similarity to native tissues and consequently cell phenotype. We develop a three-dimensional (3D)-printed fluidic chamber for dynamic stem cell culture, with emphasis on control over flow and substrate curvature in a 3D environment, two physiologic features of native tissues. The chamber geometry, consisting of an array of vertical cylindrical pillars, facilitates actin-mediated localization of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) within ∼200 μm distance from the pillars, enabling spatial patterning of hMSCs and endothelial cells in cocultures and subsequent modulation of calcium signaling between these two essential cell types in the bone marrow microenvironment. Flow-enhanced osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs in growth media imposes spatial variations of alkaline phosphatase expression, which positively correlates with local shear stress. Proliferation of hMSCs is maintained within the chamber, exceeding the cell expansion in conventional static culture. The capability to manipulate cell spatial patterning, differentiation, and 3D tissue formation through geometry and flow demonstrates the culture chamber's relevant chemomechanical cues in stem cell microenvironments, thus providing an easy-to-implement tool to study interactions among substrate curvature, shear stress, and intracellular actin machinery in the tissue-engineered construct.

Indexed as

BioreactorsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationLab-On-A-Chip DevicesCoculture TechniquesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsTissue Engineering3D printingfluidicmesenchymal stem cellsperfusion culture

Identifiers

PMID29845891
PMCPMC6302678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.