Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29845427›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019

Setting Standards for Reporting and Quantification in Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Charlotte Hoogstins, Jan Jaap Burggraaf, Marjory Koller, Henricus Handgraaf, Leonora Boogerd, Gooitzen van Dam, Alexander Vahrmeijer, Jacobus Burggraaf

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Targeted Fluorescence Imaging of Bevacizumab-800CW in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Application of methylene blue near-infrared fluorescence imaging for oral sentinel lymph node mapping in rats].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte HoogstinsDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jan Jaap BurggraafDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marjory KollerDepartment of Surgery, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and Intensive Care, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Henricus HandgraafDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leonora BoogerdDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Gooitzen van DamDepartment of Surgery, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and Intensive Care, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Alexander VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobus BurggraafCentre for Human Drug Research and Leiden Center for Academic Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333, CL, Leiden, the Netherlands. kb@chdr.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-0918
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative fluorescence imaging (FI) is a promising technique that could potentially guide oncologic surgeons toward more radical resections and thus improve clinical outcome. Despite the increase in the number of clinical trials, fluorescent agents and imaging systems for intraoperative FI, a standardized approach for imaging system performance assessment and post-acquisition image analysis is currently unavailable. PROCEDURES: We conducted a systematic, controlled comparison between two commercially available imaging systems using a novel calibration device for FI systems and various fluorescent agents. In addition, we analyzed fluorescence images from previous studies to evaluate signal-to-background ratio (SBR) and determinants of SBR.

resultsUsing the calibration device, imaging system performance could be quantified and compared, exposing relevant differences in sensitivity. Image analysis demonstrated a profound influence of background noise and the selection of the background on SBR.

conclusionsIn this article, we suggest clear approaches for the quantification of imaging system performance assessment and post-acquisition image analysis, attempting to set new standards in the field of FI.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMonitoring, IntraoperativePractice Guidelines as TopicAnimalsCalibrationHumansNeoplasmsOptical ImagingReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise RatioSurgery, Computer-AssistedFluorescenceImage analysisOptical imagingPhantomQuantificationSignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID29845427
OpenAlexW2806547239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.