ArticleJournal of anesthesia2018
Comparison of Duke Activity Status Index with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer patients.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated with the Uncoupling of Perceived and Achieved Exercise Capacity in Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.The American journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Preoperative submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its association with early postoperative complications.BJA open · 2025Article
- Patient-reported questionnaires to preoperatively identify high-risk surgical patients.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Criterion Validity of Screening Tools and Field-Based Tests for Health-Related Physical Fitness in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Usefulness of the Duke Activity Status Index to Assess Exercise Capacity and Predict Risk Stratification in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Construct validity and responsiveness of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) as a measure of recovery after colorectal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Subjective methods for preoperative assessment of functional capacity.BJA education · 2022Review
- Self-reported exercise capacity among current smokers eligible for lung cancer screening: Distribution and association with key comorbidities.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2021Article
- A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists' and surgeons' perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2019Article
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the duke activity status index in the hindi language.Annals of cardiac anaesthesiaObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), a patient-administered questionnaire, is used to quantify functional capacity in patients undergoing cancer surgery.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study assessed whether the DASI was accurate in predicting peak oxygen consumption (pVO
resultsThe study population was elderly (median 63 years, interquartile range 18), 58% were male, with the majority having intraabdominal cancer surgery. Although the DASI scores were statistically related to the measured pVO
conclusionIn summary, both the limits of agreement and bias between the measured and DASI-predicted pVO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.