Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29845145›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2018

Use of porous membranes in tissue barrier and co-culture models.

Henry H Chung, Marcela Mireles, Bradley J Kwarta, Thomas R Gaborski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical and translational evaluation of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Emulsion templating of PCL:PGS methacrylate blends for soft tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Study Models forMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henry H ChungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA. thomas.gaborski@rit.edu.
Marcela Mireles
Bradley J Kwarta
Thomas R Gaborski

Funding

Transparent Ultrathin Nanomembranes for Barrier Cell Models and Novel Co-Culture SystemsR35GM119623 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABORSKI, THOMAS R · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous membranes enable the partitioning of cellular microenvironments in vitro, while still allowing physical and biochemical crosstalk between cells, a feature that is often necessary for recapitulating physiological functions. This article provides an overview of the different membranes used in tissue barrier and cellular co-culture models with a focus on experimental design and control of these systems. Specifically, we discuss how the structural, mechanical, chemical, and even the optical and transport properties of different membranes bestow specific advantages and disadvantages through the context of physiological relevance. This review also explores how membrane pore properties affect perfusion and solute permeability by developing an analytical framework to guide the design and use of tissue barrier or co-culture models. Ultimately, this review offers insight into the important aspects one must consider when using porous membranes in tissue barrier and lab-on-a-chip applications.

Indexed as

Coculture TechniquesMembranes, ArtificialModels, BiologicalTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell LineHumansMicePorosityTissue Culture TechniquesMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID29845145
PMCPMC5997570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.