Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29845048›Full record

ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2018

Undergraduate Plastic Surgery Education: A National Survey of Clerkship Directors.

Alexander Morzycki, Martin LeBlanc, Jason Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander MorzyckiDivision of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Martin LeBlancDivision of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jason WilliamsDivision of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe delivery of medical education has received increased attention in recent years due to ongoing time and financial constraints faced by medical educators. Given the recent calls to action by the Carnegie Foundation and Health Canada, an evaluation of the specialty education sector is warranted. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of the Canadian plastic surgery undergraduate clerkship curriculum.

methodAn anonymous electronic survey was distributed to the plastic surgery clerkship directors of all Canadian medical schools (N = 17). The survey consisted of Likert scales and open-ended short answer questions. Themes included general clerkship information, exposure characteristics, teaching characteristics, resource characteristics, and challenges and barriers faced by clerkship directors.

resultsSurvey response rate was 88%. All responding schools offered a clerkship rotation of varying length in time (1-4 weeks). Students had the most exposure to breast surgery (100%) and general plastic surgery (100%) and the least exposure to aesthetic surgery (40%). Sixty percent of schools indicated the use of modern educational methods. Resources available for teaching students varied. Rotations received excellent feedback from medical students (67%). More than half of respondents would like to see a universal, nationally formulated plastic surgery clerkship curriculum.

conclusionThere is significant heterogeneity in the delivery of plastic surgery clerkship in Canada. A number of areas for improvement have been identified. We hope to establish a national plastic surgery clerkship task force to address the concerns raised here and improve the delivery of undergraduate medical education. Assessment of students based on a national curriculum may help in decision-making regarding plastic surgery program admissions by introducing an element of standardization to clerkship exposure.

Indexed as

adult learnerclerkshipplastic surgery educationundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID29845048
PMCPMC5967164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.