ArticleOncogene2018
Melanoma protective antitumor immunity activated by catalytic DNA.
Article in Oncogene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jun, an Oncological Foe or Friend?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Studies on the Effect of Lipofectamine and Cell-Penetrating Peptide on the Properties of 10-23 DNAzyme.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Photodynamic treatment of melanoma cells using aza-dipyrromethenes as photosensitizers.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma incidence is increasing worldwide, and although drugs such as BRAF/MEK small-molecule inhibitors and immune checkpoint antibodies improve patient outcomes, most patients ultimately fail these therapies and alternative treatment strategies are urgently needed. DNAzymes have recently undergone clinical trials with signs of efficacy and no serious adverse events attributable to the DNAzyme. Here we investigated c-Jun expression in human primary and metastatic melanoma. We also explored the role of T cell immunity in DNAzyme inhibition of primary melanoma growth and the prevention of growth in non-treated tumors after the cessation of treatment in a mouse model. c-Jun was expressed in 80% of melanoma cells in human primary melanomas (n = 17) and in 83% of metastatic melanoma cells (n = 38). In contrast, c-Jun was expressed in only 11% of melanocytes in benign nevi (n = 24). Dz13, a DNAzyme targeting c-Jun/AP-1, suppressed both Dz13-injected and untreated B16F10 melanoma growth in the same mice, an abscopal effect relieved in each case by administration of anti-CD4/anti-CD8 antibodies. Dz13 increased levels of cleaved caspase-3 within the tumors. New, untreated melanomas grew poorly in mice previously treated with Dz13. Administration of anti-CD4/anti-CD8 antibodies ablated this inhibitory effect and the tumors grew rapidly. Dz13 inhibited c-Jun expression, reduced intratumoral vascularity (vascular lumina area defined by CD31 staining), and increased CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.