Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29844516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A novel concept for dynamic adjustment of auditory space.

A Lingner, M Pecka, C Leibold, B Grothe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Time scales of adaptation to context in horizontal sound localization.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. The role of GABAFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A LingnerDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Großhaderner Str. 2-4, D-82152, Martinsried, Planegg, Germany.
M PeckaDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Großhaderner Str. 2-4, D-82152, Martinsried, Planegg, Germany.
C LeiboldBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich, Großhaderner Straße 2-4, D-82152, Martinsried, Germany.
B GrotheDivision of Neurobiology, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Großhaderner Str. 2-4, D-82152, Martinsried, Planegg, Germany. grothe@lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the auditory system is thought to serve reliable sound localization. Stimulus-history driven feedback circuits in the early binaural pathway, however, contradict this canonical concept and raise questions about their functional significance. Here we show that stimulus-history dependent changes in absolute space perception are poorly captured by the traditional labeled-line and hemispheric-difference models of auditory space coding. We therefore developed a new decoding model incorporating recent electrophysiological findings in which sound location is initially computed in both brain hemispheres independently and combined to yield a hemispherically balanced code. This model closely captures the observed absolute localization errors caused by stimulus history, and furthermore predicts a selective dilation and compression of perceptional space. These model predictions are confirmed by improvement and degradation of spatial resolution in human listeners. Thus, dynamic perception of auditory space facilitates focal sound source segregation at the expense of absolute sound localization, questioning existing concepts of spatial hearing.

Identifiers

PMID29844516
PMCPMC5974081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.