Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29844491›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The evolution of genomic and epigenomic features in two Pleurotus fungi.

Zhibin Zhang, Jiawei Wen, Juzuo Li, Xintong Ma, Yanan Yu, Xiao Tan, Qi Wang, Bao Liu, Xiaomeng Li, Yu Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chromosome-Level Genome Announcement of the MonokaryoticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic and Chemical Diversity of Edible MushroomBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  7. Genome-wide mapping of histone modifications during axenic growth in two species of Leptosphaeria maculans showing contrasting genomic organization.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The saprotrophicIMA fungus · 2020
    Article
  16. Genetic improvement in3 Biotech · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhibin ZhangKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Jiawei WenKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Juzuo LiKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Xintong MaKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Yanan YuKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Xiao TanJilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (JAAS), Changchun, 130033, China.
Qi WangEngineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education (MOE) for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China.
Bao LiuKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Xiaomeng LiKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Yu LiEngineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education (MOE) for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, Jilin, China. yuli966@126.com.
Lei GongKey Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China. gongl100@nenu.edu.cn.
Northeast Normal University · CNJilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNJilin Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleurotus tuoliensis (Bailinggu, designated Pt) and P. eryngii var. eryngii (Xingbaogu, designated Pe) are highly valued edible mushrooms. We report de novo assemblies of high-quality genomes for both mushrooms based on PacBio RS II sequencing and annotation of all identified genes. A comparative genomics analysis between Pt and Pe with P. ostreatus as an outgroup taxon revealed extensive genomic divergence between the two mushroom genomes primarily due to the rapid gain of taxon-specific genes and disruption of synteny in either taxon. The re-appraised phylogenetic relationship between Pt and Pe at the genome-wide level validates earlier proposals to designate Pt as an independent species. Variation of the identified wood-decay-related gene content can largely explain the variable adaptation and host specificity of the two mushrooms. On the basis of the two assembled genome sequences, methylomes and the regulatory roles of DNA methylation in gene expression were characterized and compared. The genome, methylome and transcriptome data of these two important mushrooms will provide valuable information for advancing our understanding of the evolution of Pleurotus and related genera and for facilitating genome- and epigenome-based strategies for mushroom breeding.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsEvolution, MolecularDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, FungalPhylogenyPleurotus

Identifiers

PMID29844491
PMCPMC5974365
OpenAlexW2806786008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.