ArticleScientific reports2018
Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanosecond Electric Pulses as a Novel In Situ Vaccination Strategy for Cancer Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges and Prospects.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Precise mimicry of physiological CaBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Protein-mediated electroporation: Pore formation in a calcium voltage-sensing domain induced by positive and negative nanosecond pulsed electric fields.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Impact of pulse duration on cardiac electroporation: nanosecond pulses enhance cardiomyocyte selectivity and promote a Raman-detected shift towards apoptotic cell death.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Excitation and electroporation in genetically engineered excitable S-HEK cells exposed to electric pulses of different durations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Extracellular Kir2.1Circulation research · 2024Article
- Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review and a Look into its Future.The heart surgery forum · 2024Article
- Dynamics of cell membrane lesions and adaptive conductance under the electrical stress.Cell stress · 2024Article
- Protein-Mediated Electroporation in a Cardiac Voltage-Sensing Domain Due to an nsPEF Stimulus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Extracellular cysteine disulfide bond break at Cys122 disrupts PIPbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- LncRNA Regulation Mechanism in Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis with Nanosecond Pulse.Acta parasitologica · 2023Article
- Article
- Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Surgical Ablation of Cardiac Tissue with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in Swine.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Reversible and Irreversible Effects of Electroporation on Contractility and Calcium Homeostasis in Isolated Cardiac Ventricular Myocytes.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022Article
- Kir2.1 dysfunction at the sarcolemma and the sarcoplasmic reticulum causes arrhythmias in a mouse model of Andersen-Tawil syndrome type 1.Nature cardiovascular research · 2022Article
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF): Opening the Biotechnological Pandora's Box.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- HumanFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intense electric shocks of nanosecond (ns) duration can become a new modality for more efficient but safer defibrillation. We extended strength-duration curves for excitation of cardiomyocytes down to 200 ns, and compared electroporative damage by proportionally more intense shocks of different duration. Enzymatically isolated murine, rabbit, and swine adult ventricular cardiomyocytes (VCM) were loaded with a Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.