Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29844373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Habituation of phase-locked local field potentials and gamma-band oscillations recorded from the human insula.

Giulia Liberati, Maxime Algoet, Anne Klöcker, Susana Ferrao Santos, Jose Geraldo Ribeiro-Vaz, Christian Raftopoulos, André Mouraux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Human Insula Reimagined: Single Neurons Respond to Simple Sounds during Passive Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Human insula neurons respond to simple sounds during passive listening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Entangled brains and the experience of pains.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia LiberatiInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. giulia.liberati@uclouvain.be.
Maxime AlgoetInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne KlöckerInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Susana Ferrao SantosDepartment of Neurology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jose Geraldo Ribeiro-VazDepartment of Neurosurgery, Saint-Luc University Hospital, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Christian RaftopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Saint-Luc University Hospital, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
André MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salient nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli elicit low-frequency local field potentials (LFPs) in the human insula. Nociceptive stimuli also elicit insular gamma-band oscillations (GBOs), possibly preferential for thermonociception, which have been suggested to reflect the intensity of perceived pain. To shed light on the functional significance of these two responses, we investigated whether they would be modulated by stimulation intensity and temporal expectation - two factors contributing to stimulus saliency. Insular activity was recorded from 8 depth electrodes (41 contacts) implanted in the left insula of 6 patients investigated for epilepsy. Thermonociceptive, vibrotactile, and auditory stimuli were delivered using two intensities. To investigate the effects of temporal expectation, the stimuli were delivered in trains of three identical stimuli (S1-S2-S3) separated by a constant 1-s interval. Stimulation intensity affected intensity of perception, the magnitude of low-frequency LFPs, and the magnitude of nociceptive GBOs. Stimulus repetition did not affect perception. In contrast, both low-frequency LFPs and nociceptive GBOs showed a marked habituation of the responses to S2 and S3 as compared to S1 and, hence, a dissociation with intensity of perception. Most importantly, although insular nociceptive GBOs appear to be preferential for thermonociception, they cannot be considered as a correlate of perceived pain.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMaleMiddle AgedNociceptorsPain PerceptionReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID29844373
PMCPMC5974133
OpenAlexW2806273884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.