ArticleScientific reports2018
Classification of Spatiotemporal Neural Activity Patterns in Brain Imaging Data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved spatio-temporal measurements of visually evoked fields using optically-pumped magnetometers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Optical voltage imaging in neurons: moving from technology development to practical tool.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various patterns of neural activity are observed in dynamic cortical imaging data. Such patterns may reflect how neurons communicate using the underlying circuitry to perform appropriate functions; thus it is crucial to investigate the spatiotemporal characteristics of the observed neural activity patterns. In general, however, neural activities are highly nonlinear and complex, so it is a demanding job to analyze them quantitatively or to classify the patterns of observed activities in various types of imaging data. Here, we present our implementation of a novel method that successfully addresses the above issues for precise comparison and classification of neural activity patterns. Based on two-dimensional representations of the geometric structure and temporal evolution of activity patterns, our method successfully classified a number of computer-generated sample patterns created from combinations of various spatial and temporal patterns. In addition, we validated our method with voltage-sensitive dye imaging data of Alzheimer's disease (AD) model mice. Our analysis algorithm successfully distinguished the activity data of AD mice from that of wild type with significantly higher performance than previously suggested methods. Our result provides a pragmatic solution for precise analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of neural imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.