Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29844346›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Classification of Spatiotemporal Neural Activity Patterns in Brain Imaging Data.

Min Song, Minseok Kang, Hyeonsu Lee, Yong Jeong, Se-Bum Paik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min SongDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Minseok KangDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonsu LeeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Yong JeongDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. yong@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-5907-3787
Se-Bum PaikDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. sbpaik@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-4078-305X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various patterns of neural activity are observed in dynamic cortical imaging data. Such patterns may reflect how neurons communicate using the underlying circuitry to perform appropriate functions; thus it is crucial to investigate the spatiotemporal characteristics of the observed neural activity patterns. In general, however, neural activities are highly nonlinear and complex, so it is a demanding job to analyze them quantitatively or to classify the patterns of observed activities in various types of imaging data. Here, we present our implementation of a novel method that successfully addresses the above issues for precise comparison and classification of neural activity patterns. Based on two-dimensional representations of the geometric structure and temporal evolution of activity patterns, our method successfully classified a number of computer-generated sample patterns created from combinations of various spatial and temporal patterns. In addition, we validated our method with voltage-sensitive dye imaging data of Alzheimer's disease (AD) model mice. Our analysis algorithm successfully distinguished the activity data of AD mice from that of wild type with significantly higher performance than previously suggested methods. Our result provides a pragmatic solution for precise analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of neural imaging data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuroimagingVoltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging

Identifiers

PMID29844346
PMCPMC5974089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.