Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29844166›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Limiting global-mean temperature increase to 1.5-2 °C could reduce the incidence and spatial spread of dengue fever in Latin America.

Felipe J Colón-González, Ian Harris, Timothy J Osborn, Christine Steiner São Bernardo, Carlos A Peres, Paul R Hunter, Iain R Lake

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of climate change on neglected tropical diseases: a systematic review.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Climate change, malaria and neglected tropical diseases: a scoping review.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Felipe J Colón-GonzálezSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom; f.colon@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9671-3405
Ian HarrisSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Timothy J OsbornSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Christine Steiner São BernardoLaboratorio de Mastozoologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Cavalhada, Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil 78200-000.
Carlos A PeresSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Paul R HunterNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-6144
Iain R LakeSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Paris Climate Agreement aims to hold global-mean temperature well below 2 °C and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 °C above preindustrial levels. While it is recognized that there are benefits for human health in limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, the magnitude with which those societal benefits will be accrued remains unquantified. Crucial to public health preparedness and response is the understanding and quantification of such impacts at different levels of warming. Using dengue in Latin America as a study case, a climate-driven dengue generalized additive mixed model was developed to predict global warming impacts using five different global circulation models, all scaled to represent multiple global-mean temperature assumptions. We show that policies to limit global warming to 2 °C could reduce dengue cases by about 2.8 (0.8-7.4) million cases per year by the end of the century compared with a no-policy scenario that warms by 3.7 °C. Limiting warming further to 1.5 °C produces an additional drop in cases of about 0.5 (0.2-1.1) million per year. Furthermore, we found that by limiting global warming we can limit the expansion of the disease toward areas where incidence is currently low. We anticipate our study to be a starting point for more comprehensive studies incorporating socioeconomic scenarios and how they may further impact dengue incidence. Our results demonstrate that although future climate change may amplify dengue transmission in the region, impacts may be avoided by constraining the level of warming.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideClimate ChangeDengueGlobal WarmingHumansIncidenceLatin AmericaTemperatureCarbon Dioxideclimate change impactsdisease modelingLatin America

Identifiers

PMID29844166
PMCPMC6004471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.