Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843787›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2018

Sex differences in basal hypothalamic anorectic and orexigenic gene expression and the effect of quantitative and qualitative food restriction.

S D Caughey, P W Wilson, N Mukhtar, S Brocklehurst, A Reid, R B D'Eath, T Boswell, I C Dunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of SOCS3 in POMC neurons in metabolic and cardiovascular regulation.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S D CaugheyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. sarah.caughey@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
P W WilsonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
N MukhtarThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
S BrocklehurstBioinformatics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
A ReidThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
R B D'EathScotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
T BoswellSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.
I C DunnThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
Roslin Institute · GBBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland · GBNewcastle University · GBScotland's Rural College · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004316/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L000199/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/30002276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch into energy balance and growth has infrequently considered genetic sex, yet there is sexual dimorphism for growth across the animal kingdom. We test the hypothesis that in the chicken, there is a sex difference in arcuate nucleus neuropeptide gene expression, since previous research indicates hypothalamic AGRP expression is correlated with growth potential and that males grow faster than females. Because growth has been heavily selected in some chicken lines, food restriction is necessary to improve reproductive performance and welfare, but this increases hunger. Dietary dilution has been proposed to ameliorate this undesirable effect. We aimed to distinguish the effects of gut fullness from nutritional feedback on hypothalamic gene expression and its interaction with sex.

methodsTwelve-week-old male and female fast-growing chickens were either released from restriction and fed ad libitum or a restricted diet plus 15% w/w ispaghula husk, a non-nutritive bulking agent, for 2 days. A control group remained on quantitative restriction. Hypothalamic arcuate nucleus neuropeptides were measured using real-time PCR. To confirm observed sex differences, the experiment was repeated using only ad libitum and restricted fed fast-growing chickens and in a genetically distinct breed of ad libitum fed male and female chickens. Linear mixed models (Genstat 18) were used for statistical analysis with transformation where appropriate.

resultsThere were pronounced sex differences: expression of the orexigenic genes AGRP (P < 0.001) and NPY (P < 0.002) was higher in males of the fast-growing strain. In genetically distinct chickens, males had higher AGRP mRNA (P = 0.002) expression than females, suggesting sex difference was not restricted to a fast-growing strain. AGRP (P < 0.001) expression was significantly decreased in ad libitum fed birds but was high and indistinguishable between birds on a quantitative versus qualitative restricted diet. Inversely, gene expression of the anorectic genes POMC and CART was significantly higher in ad libitum fed birds but no consistent sex differences were observed.

conclusionExpression of orexigenic peptides in the avian hypothalamus are significantly different between sexes. This could be useful starting point of investigating further if AGRP is an indicator of growth potential. Results also demonstrate that gut fill alone does not reduce orexigenic gene expression.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionGene ExpressionAgouti-Related ProteinAnimalsAvian ProteinsChickensCocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript ProteinEatingFemaleHypothalamusMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuropeptide YPro-OpiomelanocortinAgouti-Related ProteinAvian ProteinsCocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuropeptide YPro-OpiomelanocortinAGRPBody weightGrowthPOMCPsylliumSatietySex

Identifiers

PMID29843787
PMCPMC5975468
OpenAlexW2805226176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.