Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843766›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of bioactive glass (S53P4) in the treatment of non-unions of the tibia and femur: study protocol of a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Michael C Tanner, Raban Heller, Fabian Westhauser, Matthias Miska, Thomas Ferbert, Christian Fischer, Simone Gantz, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Patrick Haubruck

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05018130 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Bio-Integrative Versus Metallic Screws for Calcaneus Osteotomies: A Non- Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsFlatfoot, Bone Resorption, Cavus Deformity, OsteolysisArmsCalcaneus Osteotomy (Metallic), Calcaneus Osteotomy (Bio-integrative)
NCT05049915 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Bioactive Glass (S53P4) in the Treatment of Non-unions of the Tibia and Femur: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastian FindeisenRan2018 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsPseudoarthrosis of BoneArmsbioglass (S53P4), RIA and TCP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Time to consider fracture nonunion an orphan disease? An update into pathophysiology, epidemiology and therapeutic solutions.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Engineering the bone reconstruction surgery: the case of the masquelet-induced membrane technique.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael C TannerHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Raban HellerHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian WesthauserHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias MiskaHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FerbertHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian FischerHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simone GantzHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerhard SchmidmaierHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick HaubruckHTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany. patrick.haubruck@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-0387

Funding

BonAlive Industry Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of non-union remains challenging and often necessitates augmentation of the resulting defect with an autologous bone graft (ABG). ABG is limited in quantity and its harvesting incurs an additional surgical intervention leaving the risk for associated complications and morbidities. Therefore, artificial bone graft substitutes that might replace autologous bone are needed. S53P4-type bioactive glass (BaG) is a promising material which might be used as bone graft substitute due to its osteostimulative, conductive and antimicrobial properties. In this study, we plan to examine the clinical effectiveness of BaG as a bone graft substitute in Masquelet therapy in comparison with present standard Masquelet therapy using an ABG with tricalciumphosphate to fill the bone defect. METHODS/

designThis randomized controlled, clinical non-inferiority trial will be carried out at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology at Heidelberg University. Patients who suffer from tibial or femoral non-unions with a segmental bone defect of 2-5 cm and who are receiving Masquelet treatment will be included in the study. The resulting bone defect will either be filled with autologous bone and tricalciumphosphate (control group, N = 25) or BaG (S53P4) (study group, N = 25). Subsequent to operative therapy, all patients will receive the same standardized follow-up procedures. The primary endpoint of the study is union achieved 1year after surgery. DISCUSSION: The results from the current study will help evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this promising biomaterial in non-union therapy. In addition, this randomized trial will help to identify potential benefits and limitations regarding the use of BaG in Masquelet therapy. Data from the study will increase the knowledge about BaG as a bone graft substitute as well as identify patients possibly benefiting from Masquelet therapy using BaG and those who are more likely to fail, thereby improving the quality of non-union treatment.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00013882 . Registered on 22 January 2018.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingGlassAutograftsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationEquivalence Trials as TopicFemoral FracturesFractures, UnunitedGermanyHumansOsseointegrationProspective StudiesTibial FracturesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomebioactive glass S53P4Bone SubstitutesBioactive glassBone graftingBone regenerationMasquelet therapyNon-unionPseudarthrosisS53P4

Identifiers

PMID29843766
PMCPMC5975373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.