Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843754›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2018

Immune checkpoint therapy in liver cancer.

Feng Xu, Tianqiang Jin, Yuwen Zhu, Chaoliu Dai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 250 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed, 407 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defect-Engineered BiOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Tianqiang JinDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China.
Yuwen ZhuDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, RC1-North Building, P18-8116, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. yuwen.zhu@ucdenver.edu.
Chaoliu DaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China. daichaoliusjh@126.com.
China Medical University · CNUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoints include stimulatory and inhibitory checkpoint molecules. In recent years, inhibitory checkpoints, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have been identified to suppress anti-tumor immune responses in solid tumors. Novel drugs targeting immune checkpoints have succeeded in cancer treatment. Specific PD-1 blockades were approved for treatment of melanoma in 2014 and for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in 2015 in the United States, European Union, and Japan. Preclinical and clinical studies show immune checkpoint therapy provides survival benefit for greater numbers of patients with liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, two main primary liver cancers. The combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies is being evaluated in phase 1, 2 or 3 trials, and the results suggest that an anti-PD-1 antibody combined with locoregional therapy or other molecular targeted agents is an effective treatment strategy for HCC. In addition, studies on activating co-stimulatory receptors to enhance anti-tumor immune responses have increased our understanding regarding this immunotherapy in liver cancer. Epigenetic modulations of checkpoints for improving the tumor microenvironment also expand our knowledge of potential therapeutic targets in improving the tumor microenvironment and restoring immune recognition and immunogenicity. In this review, we summarize current knowledge and recent developments in immune checkpoint-based therapies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma and attempt to clarify the mechanisms underlying its effects.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCholangiocarcinomaEpigeneticsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpointImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29843754
PMCPMC5975687
OpenAlexW2807322325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.