Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843711›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Operational assessment of point-of-care diagnostics in rural primary healthcare clinics of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a cross-sectional survey.

T P Mashamba-Thompson, B Sartorius, P K Drain

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02692274 (Evaluating the Accessibility and Utility of HIV-related Point of Care Diagnostic for Maternal Health in Rural South Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02692274 completednot on this map

Evaluating the Accessibility and Utility of HIV-related Point of Care Diagnostic for Maternal Health in Rural South Africa

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of KwaZuluRan2015 to 2016Enrolled309ConditionsHIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nucleic Acid Point-of-Care Testing to Improve Diagnostic Preparedness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T P Mashamba-ThompsonDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2nd Floor, George Campbell Building, Science Drive, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4001, South Africa. Mashamba-Thompson@ukzn.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-4193-2416
B SartoriusDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2nd Floor, George Campbell Building, Science Drive, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
P K DrainInternational Clinical Research Center, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Funding

Clinic-based Screening to Prevent HIV-associated Cryptococcal MortalityK23AI108293 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DRAIN, PAUL K · 2014 to 2018
$928k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease of the National Institutes of Health K23 AI108293NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI108293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) called for new clinical diagnostic for settings with limited access to laboratory services. Access to diagnostic testing may not be uniform in rural settings, which may result in poor access to essential healthcare services. The aim of this study is to determine the availability, current usage, and need for point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests among rural primary healthcare (PHC) clinics in South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province.

methodsWe used the KZN's Department of Health (DoH) clinic classification to identify the 232 rural PHC clinics in KZN, South Africa. We then randomly sampled 100 of 232 rural PHC clinics. Selected health clinics were surveyed between April to August 2015 to obtain clinic-level data for health-worker volume and to determine the accessibility, availability, usage and need for POC tests. Professional healthcare workers responsible for POC testing at each clinic were interviewed to assess the awareness of POC testing. Data were survey weighted and analysed using Stata 13.

resultsAmong 100 rural clinics, the average number of patients seen per week was 2865 ± 2231 (range 374-11,731). The average number of POC tests available and in use was 6.3 (CI: 6.2-6.5) out of a potential of 51 tests. The following POC tests were universally available in all rural clinics: urine total protein, urine leukocytes, urine nitrate, urine pregnancy, HIV antibody and blood glucose test. The average number of desired POC diagnostic tests reported by the clinical staff was estimated at 15 (CI: 13-17) per clinic. The most requested POC tests reported were serum creatinine (37%), CD4 count (37%), cholesterol (32%), tuberculosis (31%), and HIV viral load (23%).

conclusionSeveral POC tests are widely available and in use at rural PHC clinics in South Africa's KZN province. However, healthcare workers have requested additional POC tests to improve detection and management of priority disease conditions.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02692274.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesPoint-of-Care TestingPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningPregnancySouth AfricaDiagnostic testingHealth servicesKwaZulu-NatalPoint-of-care testPrimary healthcare clinicsRural healthSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID29843711
PMCPMC5975682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.