ArticleBMC health services research2018
Application of a sub-specialties management model improves quality control in a central sterile supply department.
Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Central sterile supply departament management on hospital-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2025Pooled it
- Occupational Noise in the Central Sterile Supply Department: A Narrative Review of Exposure, Mechanisms, and Control.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- A review of the sterile processing department's reprocessing of surgical instruments.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Review
- Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in Central Sterile Supply Department Under High-Quality Development of Public Hospitals: A Narrative Review.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Implementing '6S' Nursing Management in Sterilization and Supply Centers: Enhancing Surgical Instrument Quality and Work Efficiency.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Improving precision instrument cleaning with a quality control module: implementation and outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Application study of surgical instruments information management system in sports medicine specialty.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Perception of Nursing Professionals Working in a Central Sterile Supplies Department regarding Health Conditions, Workload, Ergonomic Risks, and Functional Readaptation.Advances in preventive medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of medical devices is crucial to safe, high-quality surgical care, but has received little attention in the medical literature. This study explored the effect of a sub-specialties management model in the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD).
methodsA traditional routine management model (control) was applied from September 2015 through April 2016, and a newly developed sub-specialties management model (observation) was applied from July 2016 through February 2017. Health personnel from various clinical departments were randomly selected to participate as the control (n = 86) and observation (n = 90) groups, respectively. The groups were compared for rates of personnel satisfaction, complaints regarding device errors, and damage of medical devices.
resultsThe satisfaction score of the observation group (95.8 ± 1.2) was significantly higher than that of the control (90.2 ± 2.3; P = 0.000). The rate of complaints of the observation group (3.3%) was significantly lower than that of the control (11.6%; P = 0.035). The quality control regarding recycle and packing was significantly higher during the observation period than the control period, which favorably influenced the scores for satisfaction. The rate of damage to specialist medical devices during the observation period (0.40%) was lower than during the control period (0.61%; P = 0.003). The theoretical knowledge and practical skills of the CSSD professionals improved after application of the sub-specialties management model.
conclusionsA management model that considers the requirements of specialist medical devices can improve quality control in the CSSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.