Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843691›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Impacts of online and group perinatal education: a mixed methods study protocol for the optimization of perinatal health services.

Geneviève Roch, Roxane Borgès Da Silva, Francine de Montigny, Holly O Witteman, Tamarha Pierce, Sonia Semenic, Julie Poissant, André-Anne Parent, Deena White, Nils Chaillet and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Geneviève RochFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. genevieve.roch@fsi.ulaval.ca.
Roxane Borgès Da SilvaUniversité de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 avenue du Parc, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Francine de MontignyDepartment of Nursing, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 283 boulevard Alexandre-Taché CP 1250, Gatineau, QC, J8X 3X7, Canada.
Holly O WittemanCHU de Québec Research Centre - Université Laval, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
Tamarha PierceSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, 2325 Allée des Bibliothèques, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Sonia SemenicIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Julie PoissantInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, 945 av Wolfe, Québec City, QC, G1V 5B3, Canada.
André-Anne ParentSchool of Social Work, Université de Montréal, 3150 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, H3T 1N8, Canada.
Deena WhiteDépartement de sociologie, Université de Montréal, 3150 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, H3T 1N8, Canada.
Nils ChailletUniversité de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 avenue du Parc, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Carl-Ardy DuboisUniversité de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 avenue du Parc, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Mathieu OuimetCHU de Québec Research Centre - Université Laval, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
Geneviève LapointeFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Stéphane TurcotteCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, 143 rue Wolfe, Lévis, QC, G6V 3Z1, Canada.
Alexandre Prud'hommeUniversité de Montréal Public Health Research Institute, 7101 avenue du Parc, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
Geneviève Painchaud GuérardCHU de Québec Research Centre - Université Laval, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Université Laval · CAUniversité de Montréal · CACentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CAHôpital Saint-François d'Assise · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec en Outaouais · CA

Funding

CIHR PHE-148163Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé PHE-148163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal education is a core component of perinatal care and services provided by health institutions. Whereas group prenatal education is the most common educational model, some health institutions have opted to implement online prenatal education to address accessibility issues as well as the evolving needs of future parents. Various studies have shown that prenatal education can be effective in acquisition of knowledge on labour and delivery, reducing psychological distress and maximising father's involvement. However, these results may depend on educational material, organization, format and content. Furthermore, the effectiveness of online prenatal education compared to group prenatal education remains unclear in the literature. This project aims to evaluate the impacts of group prenatal education and online prenatal education on health determinants and users' health status, as well as on networks of perinatal educational services maintained with community-based partners.

methodsThis multipronged mixed methods study uses a collaborative research approach to integrate and mobilize knowledge throughout the process. It consists of: 1) a prospective cohort study with quantitative data collection and qualitative interviews with future and new parents; and 2) a multiple case study integrating documentary sources and interviews with stakeholders involved in the implementation of perinatal information service networks and collaborations with community partners. Perinatal health indicators and determinants will be compared between prenatal education groups (group prenatal education and online prenatal education) and standard care without these prenatal education services (control group). DISCUSSION: This study will provide knowledge about the impact of online prenatal education as a new technological service delivery model compared to traditional group prenatal education. Indicators related to the complementarity of these interventions and those available in community settings will refine our understanding of regional perinatal services networks. Results will assist decision-making regarding service organization and delivery models of prenatal education services. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 1 (February 9 2018).

Indexed as

Education, DistancePrenatal CareFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleModels, EducationalPatient Education as TopicPregnancyProspective StudiesQuebecResearch DesignChildbirth educationCommunity health networksCommunity health servicesHealth status indicatorsMixed methodsOnline educationPerinatal carePregnancyPrenatal education

Identifiers

PMID29843691
PMCPMC5975463
OpenAlexW2806787866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.