Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843686›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2018

Experiences of being screened for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women in Japan.

Yaeko Kataoka, Mikiko Imazeki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Intimate partner violence among prenatal care attendees amidst the COVID-19 crisis: The incidence in Ethiopia.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaeko KataokaSt. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan. yaeko-kataoka@slcn.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-4946
Mikiko ImazekiSt. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
St. Luke's International Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is physical, sexual or psychological violence by a current or former intimate partner. IPV threatens women's health, and during pregnancy women are more vulnerable to violence. Therefore, IPV screening has been recommended during antenatal care; however, health care providers have expressed concern about the negative impact on women and therefore have been reluctant in conducting IPV screening. Consequently our objective was to investigate pregnant women's experiences of reading and completing an IPV screening questionnaire.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with postpartum women who had received IPV screening during pregnancy to investigate their experiences using the IVP Violence Against Women Screen (VAWS). Qualitative data were analyzed based on content analysis.

resultsA total of 43 women participated in this study. There were eight (18.6%) women positive for IPV screening during pregnancy. Content analysis for all participants revealed three themes: necessity, acceptability and optimality. 'Necessity' referred to benefits for women from IPV screening, and was supported by three categories: 'redefining the relationship', 'promoting IPV awareness' and 'opportunity to initiate support'. 'Acceptability' of IPV screening was also supported by three categories: 'comfortable', 'quickly completed' and 'difficulty'. 'Optimality' meant IPV screening during pregnancy was appropriate timing for women who had been screened as either positive or negative.

conclusionsThe majority of women, including women experiencing IPV, had positive responses to IPV screening during pregnancy. Future diffusion of IPV screening requires safe environments for IPV screening and improved awareness of health care providers towards IPV.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceJapanMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersYoung AdultIntimate partner violencePregnancyQualitative studyScreening experience

Identifiers

PMID29843686
PMCPMC5975515
OpenAlexW2805347085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.