Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843682›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2018

Changes in attitudes towards hastened death among Finnish physicians over the past sixteen years.

Reetta P Piili, Riina Metsänoja, Heikki Hinkka, Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Juho T Lehto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reetta P PiiliFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. piili.reetta.p@student.uta.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-3773
Riina MetsänojaFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Heikki HinkkaRehabilitation Center Apila, Kangasala, Finland.
Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-LehtinenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Juho T LehtoFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ethics of hastened death are complex. Studies on physicians' opinions about assisted dying (euthanasia or assisted suicide) exist, but changes in physicians' attitudes towards hastened death in clinical decision-making and the background factors explaining this remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the changes in these attitudes among Finnish physicians.

methodsA questionnaire including hypothetical patient scenarios was sent to 1182 and 1258 Finnish physicians in 1999 and 2015, respectively. Two scenarios of patients with advanced cancer were presented: one requesting an increase in his morphine dose to a potentially lethal level and another suffering a cardiac arrest. Physicians' attitudes towards assisted death, life values and other background factors were queried as well. The response rate was 56%.

resultsThe morphine dose was increased by 25% and 34% of the physicians in 1999 and 2015, respectively (p < 0.001). Oncologists approved the increase most infrequently without a significant change between the study years (15% vs. 17%, p = 0.689). Oncological specialty, faith in God, female gender and younger age were independent factors associated with the reluctance to increase the morphine dose. Euthanasia, but not assisted suicide, was considered less reprehensible in 2015 (p = 0.008). In both years, most physicians (84%) withheld cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

conclusionFinnish physicians accepted the risk of hastening death more often in 2015 than in 1999. The physicians' specialty and many other background factors influenced this acceptance. They also regarded euthanasia as less reprehensible now than they did 16 years ago.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEuthanasiaPhysiciansSuicide, AssistedAdultAgedAge FactorsAttitude to DeathDeathFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedMorphineMorphineClinical ethicsDecision-makingEnd-of-life careEuthanasia

Identifiers

PMID29843682
PMCPMC5975714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.