Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843667›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Access to HIV care and treatment for migrants between Lesotho and South Africa: a mixed methods study.

Iyiola Faturiyele, Dimitris Karletsos, Keletso Ntene-Sealiete, Alfred Musekiwa, Mantiti Khabo, Marethabile Mariti, Phetole Mahasha, Thembisile Xulu, Pedro T Pisa, EQUIP Innovation for Health Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iyiola FaturiyeleEQUIP-Innovation for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Dimitris KarletsosEQUIP-Innovation for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Keletso Ntene-SealieteMinistry of Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Alfred MusekiwaEQUIP - Innovation for Health, 1006 Lenchen Avenue North, Centurion, South Africa. alfred.musekiwa@gmail.com.
Mantiti KhaboEQUIP-Innovation for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Marethabile MaritiEQUIP-Innovation for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Phetole MahashaEQUIP - Innovation for Health, 1006 Lenchen Avenue North, Centurion, South Africa.
Thembisile XuluEQUIP - Innovation for Health, 1006 Lenchen Avenue North, Centurion, South Africa.
Pedro T PisaEQUIP - Innovation for Health, 1006 Lenchen Avenue North, Centurion, South Africa.
EQUIP Innovation for Health Team
Education Labour Relations Council · ZASefako Makgatho Health Sciences University · ZAMinistry of Health · LS

Funding

U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief AID-OAA-A-15-00070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV treatment and care for migrants is affected by their mobility and interaction with HIV treatment programs and health care systems in different countries. To assess healthcare needs, preferences and accessibility barriers of HIV-infected migrant populations in high HIV burden, borderland districts of Lesotho.

methodsWe selected 15 health facilities accessed by high patient volumes in three districts of Maseru, Leribe and Mafeteng. We used a mixed methods approach by administering a survey questionnaire to consenting HIV infected individuals on anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and utilizing a purposive sampling procedure to recruit health care providers for qualitative in-depth interviews across facilities.

resultsOut of 524 HIV-infected migrants enrolled in the study, 315 (60.1%) were from urban and 209 (39.9%) from rural sites. Of these, 344 (65.6%) were women, 375 (71.6%) were aged between 26 and 45 years and 240 (45.8%) were domestic workers. A total of 486 (92.7%) preferred to collect their medications primarily in Lesotho compared to South Africa. From 506 who responded to the question on preferred dispensing intervals, 63.1% (n = 319) preferred 5-6 month ARV refills, 30.2% (n = 153) chose 3-4 month refills and only 6.7% (n = 34) opted for the standard-of-care 1-2 month refills. A total of 126 (24.4%) defaulted on their treatment and the primary reason for defaulting was failure to get to Lesotho to collect medication (59.5%, 75/126). Treatment default rates were higher in urban than rural areas (28.3% versus 18.4%, p = 0.011). Service providers indicated a lack of transfer letters as the major drawback in facilitating care and treatment for migrants, followed by discrimination based on nationality or language. Service providers indicated that most patients preferred all treatment services to be rendered in Lesotho, as they perceive the treatment provided in South Africa to be different often less strong or with more serious side effects.

conclusionExisting healthcare systems in both South Africa and Lesotho experience challenges in providing proper care and treatment for HIV infected migrants. A need for a differentiated model of ART delivery to HIV infected migrants that allows for multi-month scripting and dispensing is warranted.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveHealth Services AccessibilityTransients and MigrantsAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLesothoMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSouth AfricaARTHIV care and treatmentLesothoMigrantsMulti month scripting and dispensingSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID29843667
PMCPMC5975397
OpenAlexW2806718406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.