Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843654›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Promoting sunscreen use and skin self-examination to improve early detection and prevent skin cancer: quasi-experimental trial of an adolescent psycho-educational intervention.

Gill Hubbard, Richard G Kyle, Richard D Neal, Vincent Marmara, Ziyan Wang, Stephan U Dombrowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Review of the Impact of Sun Safety Interventions in Children.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gill HubbardSchool of Health, Social Care and Life Sciences, Centre for Health Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3JH, Scotland. gill.hubbard@uhi.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-5770
Richard G KyleSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK.
Richard D NealAcademic Unit of Primary Care, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Vincent MarmaraDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, Humanities B (FEMA), Msida, MSD, 2080, Malta.
Ziyan WangDivision of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, FK10 4LA, Stirling, Scotland.
Stephan U DombrowskiDivision of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, FK10 4LA, Stirling, Scotland.
University of Stirling · GBEdinburgh Napier University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin cancer rates are increasing. Interventions to increase adolescent sunscreen use and skin self-examination (SSE) are required.

methodsQuasi-experimental design; 1 control and 4 intervention group schools in Scotland, UK. Participants were 15-16 year old students on the school register. The intervention was a theoretically-informed (Common-Sense Model and Health Action Process Approach) 50-min presentation, delivered by a skin cancer specialist nurse and young adult skin cancer survivor, to students in a classroom, supplemented by a home-based assignment. Outcome variables were sunscreen use intention, SSE intention/behaviour, planning, illness perceptions and skin cancer communication behaviour, measured 2 weeks pre- and 4 weeks post- intervention using self-completed pen and paper survey. School attendance records were used to record intervention up-take; students self-reported completion of the home-based assignment. Pearson's chi-square test, analysis of variance, and non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test were used to measure outcomes and associations between variables. Focus groups elicited students' (n = 29) views on the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.

resultsFive of 37 invited schools participated. 639 (81%) students in intervention schools received the intervention; 33.8% completed the home-based assignment. 627 (69.6%) of students on the school register in intervention and control schools completed a questionnaire at baseline; data for 455 (72.6%) students were available at baseline and follow-up. Focus groups identified four themes - personal experiences of skin cancer, distaste for sunscreen, relevance of SSE in adolescence, and skin cancer conversations. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) changes were observed for sunscreen use, SSE, planning, and talk about skin cancer in intervention schools but not the control. Significant associations were found between sunscreen use, planning and 2 illness perceptions (identity and consequence) and between SSE, planning and 3 illness perceptions (timeline, causes, control).

conclusionsIt is feasible to promote sunscreen use and SSE in the context of an adolescent school-based psychoeducation intention. Further research is required to improve study uptake, intervention adherence and effectiveness.

trial registrationISRCTN11141528.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesDrug Administration ScheduleEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleScotlandSelf-ExaminationSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsSurveys and QuestionnairesSunscreening AgentsAdolescenceSkin cancerSkin self-examination

Identifiers

PMID29843654
PMCPMC5975556
OpenAlexW2806253206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.