Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843621›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2018

Summary results of the 2014-2015 DARPA Chikungunya challenge.

Sara Y Del Valle, Benjamin H McMahon, Jason Asher, Richard Hatchett, Joceline C Lega, Heidi E Brown, Mark E Leany, Yannis Pantazis, David J Roberts, Sean Moore and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epidemic tracking and forecasting: Lessons learned from a tumultuous year.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara Y Del ValleAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Bikini Atoll Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544, USA. sdelvall@lanl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-0159-1952
Benjamin H McMahonTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Bikini Atoll Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544, USA.
Jason AsherLeidos Supporting Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, District of Columbia, 20201, USA.
Richard HatchettOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, District of Columbia, 20201, USA.
Joceline C LegaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Arizona, 617 N. Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA.
Heidi E BrownEpidemiology and Biostatistics Department, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave, Tucson, Arizona, 85724, USA.
Mark E LeanyUtah Valley University, 800 W University Pkwy, Orem, Utah, 84058, USA.
Yannis PantazisDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, 710 N. Pleasant St, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, USA.
David J RobertsNHS Blood and Transplant-Oxford, BRC Haematology Theme and Radcliffe Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9BQ, UK.
Sean MooreDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, 46556, IN, USA.
A Townsend PetersonBiodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, USA.
Luis E EscobarDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, VA, USA.
Huijie QiaoInstitute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Nicholas W HengartnerAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Bikini Atoll Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544, USA.
Harshini MukundanChemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Bikini Atoll Road, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging pathogens such as Zika, chikungunya, Ebola, and dengue viruses are serious threats to national and global health security. Accurate forecasts of emerging epidemics and their severity are critical to minimizing subsequent mortality, morbidity, and economic loss. The recent introduction of chikungunya and Zika virus to the Americas underscores the need for better methods for disease surveillance and forecasting.

methodsTo explore the suitability of current approaches to forecasting emerging diseases, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the 2014-2015 DARPA Chikungunya Challenge to forecast the number of cases and spread of chikungunya disease in the Americas. Challenge participants (n=38 during final evaluation) provided predictions of chikungunya epidemics across the Americas for a six-month period, from September 1, 2014 to February 16, 2015, to be evaluated by comparison with incidence data reported to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). This manuscript presents an overview of the challenge and a summary of the approaches used by the winners.

resultsParticipant submissions were evaluated by a team of non-competing government subject matter experts based on numerical accuracy and methodology. Although this manuscript does not include in-depth analyses of the results, cursory analyses suggest that simpler models appear to outperform more complex approaches that included, for example, demographic information and transportation dynamics, due to the reporting biases, which can be implicitly captured in statistical models. Mosquito-dynamics, population specific information, and dengue-specific information correlated best with prediction accuracy.

conclusionWe conclude that with careful consideration and understanding of the relative advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, implementation of an effective prediction system is feasible. However, there is a need to improve the quality of the data in order to more accurately predict the course of epidemics.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverDemographyDengueDisease OutbreaksForecastingHumansInfection ControlOrganizational InnovationResearch DesignSecurity MeasuresUnited StatesUnited States Department of DefenseZika Virus InfectionChikungunyaForecastingMechanistic modelsMorphological models

Identifiers

PMID29843621
PMCPMC5975673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.