ReviewBMC infectious diseases2018
Summary results of the 2014-2015 DARPA Chikungunya challenge.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identification and evaluation of epidemic prediction and forecasting reporting guidelines: A systematic review and a call for action.Epidemics · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review and evaluation of Zika virus forecasting and prediction research during a public health emergency of international concern.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Drivers of Viral Spillover: An Examination of How Pathogens Spread.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing human judgment forecasts in the rapid spread of the mpox outbreak: insights and challenges for pandemic preparedness.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Forecasting the relative abundance of Aedes vector populations to enhance situational awareness for mosquito control operations.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Global Mpox spread due to increased air travel.Geospatial health · 2024Article
- Inference on a Multi-Patch Epidemic Model with Partial Mobility, Residency, and Demography: Case of the 2020 COVID-19 Outbreak in Hermosillo, Mexico.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Crowdsourced Perceptions of Human Behavior to Improve Computational Forecasts of US National Incident Cases of COVID-19: Survey Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- National and subnational short-term forecasting of COVID-19 in Germany and Poland during early 2021.Communications medicine · 2022Article
- An expert judgment model to predict early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Comparing human and model-based forecasts of COVID-19 in Germany and Poland.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Predictable Chikungunya Infection Dynamics in Brazil.Viruses · 2022Article
- A modified Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model for observed under-reported incidence data.PloS one · 2022Article
- Fast Evaluation of Viral Emerging Risks (FEVER): A computational tool for biosurveillance, diagnostics, and mutation typing of emerging viral pathogens.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Fast and accurate influenza forecasting in the United States with Inferno.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Epidemic tracking and forecasting: Lessons learned from a tumultuous year.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Trade-offs between individual and ensemble forecasts of an emerging infectious disease.Nature communications · 2021Article
- A pre-registered short-term forecasting study of COVID-19 in Germany and Poland during the second wave.Nature communications · 2021Article
- How New Mexico Leveraged a COVID-19 Case Forecasting Model to Preemptively Address the Health Care Needs of the State: Quantitative Analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging pathogens such as Zika, chikungunya, Ebola, and dengue viruses are serious threats to national and global health security. Accurate forecasts of emerging epidemics and their severity are critical to minimizing subsequent mortality, morbidity, and economic loss. The recent introduction of chikungunya and Zika virus to the Americas underscores the need for better methods for disease surveillance and forecasting.
methodsTo explore the suitability of current approaches to forecasting emerging diseases, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the 2014-2015 DARPA Chikungunya Challenge to forecast the number of cases and spread of chikungunya disease in the Americas. Challenge participants (n=38 during final evaluation) provided predictions of chikungunya epidemics across the Americas for a six-month period, from September 1, 2014 to February 16, 2015, to be evaluated by comparison with incidence data reported to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). This manuscript presents an overview of the challenge and a summary of the approaches used by the winners.
resultsParticipant submissions were evaluated by a team of non-competing government subject matter experts based on numerical accuracy and methodology. Although this manuscript does not include in-depth analyses of the results, cursory analyses suggest that simpler models appear to outperform more complex approaches that included, for example, demographic information and transportation dynamics, due to the reporting biases, which can be implicitly captured in statistical models. Mosquito-dynamics, population specific information, and dengue-specific information correlated best with prediction accuracy.
conclusionWe conclude that with careful consideration and understanding of the relative advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, implementation of an effective prediction system is feasible. However, there is a need to improve the quality of the data in order to more accurately predict the course of epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.