Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843619›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Patient empowerment and general self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study.

Anita Kärner Köhler, Pia Tingström, Tiny Jaarsma, Staffan Nilsson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01462799 (COR-PRIM), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01462799 naunknown statusnot on this map

COR-PRIM: Problem-based Learning in Patient Education After an Event of Coronary Heart Disease. A Randomised Study in Primary Care of Long-term Effects on Self-care

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2011 to 2019Enrolled150ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsPBL in patient education, Mailed patient information
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The relationship between self-efficacy and self-advocacy among young and middle-aged Chinese breast cancer patients: the mediating effect of health literacy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita Kärner KöhlerDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies (ISV/OMV), Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. anita.karner@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-8715
Pia TingströmDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences (IMH), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tiny JaarsmaDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies (ISV/OMV), Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Staffan NilssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences (IMH), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn managing a life with coronary heart disease and the possibility of planning and following a rehabilitation plan, patients' empowerment and self-efficacy are considered important. However, currently there is limited data on levels of empowerment among patients with coronary heart disease, and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with patient empowerment are not known. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient empowerment and general self-efficacy in patients six to 12 months after the cardiac event. We also aimed to explore the relationship between patient empowerment, general self-efficacy and other related factors such as quality of life and demographic variables.

methodsA sample of 157 cardiac patients (78% male; age 68 ± 8.5 years) was recruited from a Swedish hospital. Patient empowerment was assessed using the SWE-CES-10. Additional data was collected on general self-efficacy and well-being (EQ5D and Ladder of Life). Demographic and clinical variables were collected from medical records and interviews.

resultsThe mean levels of patient empowerment and general self-efficacy on a 0-4 scale were 3.69 (±0.54) and 3.13 (±0.52) respectively, and the relationship between patient empowerment and general self-efficacy was weak (r = 0.38). In a simple linear regression, patient empowerment and general self-efficacy were significantly correlated with marital status, current self-rated health and future well-being. Multiple linear regressions on patient empowerment (Model 1) and general self-efficacy (Model 2) showed an independent significant association between patient empowerment and current self-rated health. General self-efficacy was not independently associated with any of the variables.

conclusionsPatients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease reported high levels of empowerment and general self-efficacy at six to 12 months after the event. Clinical and demographic variables were not independently associated with empowerment or low general self-efficacy. Patient empowerment and general self-efficacy were not mutually interchangeable, and therefore both need to be measured when planning for secondary prevention in primary health care.

trial registrationNCT01462799 .

Indexed as

Coronary DiseasePatient ParticipationQuality of LifeSelf EfficacyAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSecondary PreventionSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenCoronary heart diseaseGeneral self-efficacyPatient empowermentPrimary health careSelf-rated healthWell-being

Identifiers

PMID29843619
PMCPMC5975271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.