Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843598›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Cryptic Plutella species show deep divergence despite the capacity to hybridize.

Kym D Perry, Gregory J Baker, Kevin J Powis, Joanne K Kent, Christopher M Ward, Simon W Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kym D PerrySchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia. kym.perry@sa.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-2836
Gregory J BakerSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Kevin J PowisSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Joanne K KentSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Christopher M WardSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Simon W BaxterSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-6578

Funding

Australian Research Council DP120100047Australian Research Council FT140101303Grains Research and Development Corporation DAS00094Grains Research and Development Corporation DAS00155University of Adelaide UA00146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding genomic and phenotypic diversity among cryptic pest taxa has important implications for the management of pests and diseases. The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., has been intensively studied due to its ability to evolve insecticide resistance and status as the world's most destructive pest of brassicaceous crops. The surprise discovery of a cryptic species endemic to Australia, Plutella australiana Landry & Hebert, raised questions regarding the distribution, ecological traits and pest status of the two species, the capacity for gene flow and whether specific management was required. Here, we collected Plutella from wild and cultivated brassicaceous plants from 75 locations throughout Australia and screened 1447 individuals to identify mtDNA lineages and Wolbachia infections. We genotyped genome-wide SNP markers using RADseq in coexisting populations of each species. In addition, we assessed reproductive compatibility in crossing experiments and insecticide susceptibility phenotypes using bioassays.

resultsThe two Plutella species coexisted on wild brassicas and canola crops, but only 10% of Plutella individuals were P. australiana. This species was not found on commercial Brassica vegetable crops, which are routinely sprayed with insecticides. Bioassays found that P. australiana was 19-306 fold more susceptible to four commonly-used insecticides than P. xylostella. Laboratory crosses revealed that reproductive isolation was incomplete but directionally asymmetric between the species. However, genome-wide nuclear SNPs revealed striking differences in genetic diversity and strong population structure between coexisting wild populations of each species. Nuclear diversity was 1.5-fold higher in P. australiana, yet both species showed limited variation in mtDNA. Infection with a single Wolbachia subgroup B strain was fixed in P. australiana, suggesting that a selective sweep contributed to low mtDNA diversity, while a subgroup A strain infected just 1.5% of P. xylostella.

conclusionsDespite sympatric distributions and the capacity to hybridize, strong genomic and phenotypic divergence exists between these Plutella species that is consistent with contrasting colonization histories and reproductive isolation after secondary contact. Although P. australiana is a potential pest of brassicaceous crops, it is of secondary importance to P. xylostella.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsAustraliaBiological AssayCrosses, GeneticDNA, MitochondrialFemaleFertilityGenetics, PopulationGeographyHaplotypesHeterozygoteInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesLikelihood FunctionsDNA, MitochondrialInsecticideshybridizationinsecticide resistanceLepidopteraPlutella australianaPlutella xylostellasympatricWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID29843598
PMCPMC5975261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.