ArticleActa orthopaedica2018
Identification and treatment of residual and relapsed idiopathic clubfoot in 88 children.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global prevalence, patterns, and predictors of relapse following Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic factors for recurrent idiopathic clubfoot deformity: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2022Pooled it
- Outcome of tibialis anterior tendon transfer in recurrent relapsed clubfoot deformity with concomitant peroneal nerve dysfunction.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- The potential of machine learning in classifying relapse and non-relapse in children with clubfoot based on movement patterns.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Duration and outcome of orthotic treatment in children with clubfoot - a four-year follow-up national register study of Swedish children born between 2015 and 2017.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- Kinematic Gait Impairments in Children with Clubfeet Treated by the Ponseti Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Predictive Value of Radiographs and the Pirani Score for Later Additional Surgery in Ponseti-Treated Idiopathic Clubfeet, an Observational Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Anatomical Structures Responsible for CTEV Relapse after Ponseti Treatment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Updates in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Clubfoot Deformity: a Scoping Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Article
- Congenital Clubfoot - Is the Ponseti Method the Definitive Solution?Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2021Article
- Concomitant Talocalcaneal Coalition as a Risk Factor for Early Relapse Following Ponseti Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- What is the optimal treatment for equinus deformity in walking-age children with clubfoot? A systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- Design and evaluation of a unilateral brace for preventing clubfoot relapse: A prospective study.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose - The Ponseti treatment is successful in idiopathic clubfoot. However, approximately 11-48% of all clubfeet maintain residual deformities or relapse. Early treatment, which possibly reduces the necessity for additional surgery, requires early identification of these problematic clubfeet. We identify deformities of residual/relapsed clubfeet and the treatments applied to tackle these deformities in a large tertiary clubfoot treatment center. Patients and methods - Retrospective chart review of patients who visited our clinic between 2012 and 2015 focused on demographics, deformities of the residual/relapsed clubfoot, and applied treatment. Residual deformities were defined as deformities that were never fully corrected and needed additional treatment. We defined relapse as any deformity of the clubfoot reoccurring, after initial successful treatment, with necessity for additional treatment. Results - We identified 33 patients with residual and 55 patients with relapsed clubfeet. In both groups decreased dorsal flexion and adduction were the most often registered deformities. Furthermore, often equinus/decreased dorsiflexion, active supination, and varus occurred. In more than half, typical profiles of combined deformities were found. Relapses occurred at all stages of treatment and follow-up; half of the residual or relapsed clubfeet were identified before the end of the bracing period. In half of the patients, additional treatment consisted of the Ponseti treatment, one-quarter also required adaptation of the brace protocol, and one-quarter needed additional surgery. The Ponseti treatment was mainly reapplied if feet presented with relapses or residues until the age of 5. Interpretation - Practitioners should especially be aware of equinus/decreased dorsiflexion, adduction, and active supination as a sign of a residual or relapsed clubfoot. Due to the heterogeneous profiles of these clubfeet, treatment strategy should be based on a step-by step approach including recasting, bracing, and if necessary surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.