Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843239›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2018

A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Glenn E Smith, Melanie Chandler, Julie A Fields, Jeremiah Aakre, Dona E C Locke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcome measures for Alzheimer's disease: A global inter-societal Delphi consensus.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Behavioral Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): Lessons from a Multicomponent Program.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Glenn E SmithDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Melanie ChandlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Julie A FieldsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jeremiah AakreDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dona E C LockeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · USWinnMed · US

Funding

A Multicenter Rehabilitation Intervention for Amnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR01NR012419 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHANDLER, MELANIE J, LOCKE, DONA E.C. · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe patient-centered movement in health care is increasing efforts to design studies and interventions that address the outcomes that matter most to patients and their families. Research has not adequately addressed Alzheimer's disease patient and caregiver preferences.

objectiveTo survey the outcome and treatment preferences of patients and caregivers who had completed a multicomponent behavioral intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsExtending prior work, we conducted an online survey regarding outcome and intervention preferences. Participants were patients with MCI and partners who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking ® program.

resultsBoth patient and partner respondents ranked patient quality of life as the highest priority, followed by patient self-efficacy, functional status, patient mood, and patient memory performance. Distressing behaviors and caregiver outcomes (burden, mood, and self-efficacy) had low rankings. Regarding the importance of HABIT ® program components, memory compensation training was ranked highest and wellness education lowest by all groups.

conclusionAdditional research should compare patient preference for patient reported outcomes, traditional neuropsychological and clinician outcomes, and modern biomarker outcomes.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedOnline SystemsOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeStatistics, NonparametricBehavioral interventioncaregiverdaily functionmild cognitive impairmentpatient preferencequality of life

Identifiers

PMID29843239
PMCPMC6027859
OpenAlexW2803116429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.