Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843214›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2018

Screening and function analysis of hub genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma via bioinformatics approaches.

Liang Zhang, Yi Huang, Junjun Ling, Wenlei Zhuo, Zhen Yu, Mengmeng Shao, Yunbo Luo, Yi Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Role and mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multifaceted Role of PRDM Proteins in Human Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liang ZhangCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yi HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Junjun LingInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wenlei ZhuoInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhen YuCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Mengmeng ShaoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yunbo LuoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhuCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CNArmy Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNXinqiao Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver carcinoma is a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Up to date, the mechanisms of liver cancerigenesis and development have not been fully understood. Multi-genes and pathways were involved in the tumorigenesis of liver cancer.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to screen key genes and pathways in liver cancerigenesis and development by using bioinformatics methods.

methodsA dataset GSE64041 were retrieved from GEO database and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened out. Then the DEG functions were annotated by gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis, respectively. The hub genes were further selected by protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis. Afterwards, the mRNA and protein expressions as well as the prognostic values of the hub genes were assessed.

resultsAs a result, 208 up-regulated and 82 down-regulated genes were screened out. These DEGs were mainly enriched in cell cycle and metabolism-related pathways. Through PPI analysis, TOP2A, PRDM10, CDK1, AURKA, BUB1, PLK1, CDKN3, NCAPG, BUB1B and CCNA2 were selected as hub genes, which were all over-expressed in liver cancers relative to those in normal tissues, respectively. Among them, PLK1 and CCNA2 were suggested to be prognostic factors for liver carcinoma.

conclusionIn conclusion, the present study identified several hub genes, and cell cycle and metabolism-related pathways that may play critical roles in the tumorigenesis of liver cancer. Future validation laboratory experiments are required to confirm the results.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySignal TransductionTranscriptomeCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction Mapsbioinformaticscell cyclehub genesLiver carcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29843214
PMCPMC13078479
OpenAlexW2803986573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.