Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29843074›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2018

Changing sex risk behaviors, gender norms, and relationship dynamics among couples in Cape Town, South Africa: Efficacy of an intervention on the dyad.

Ilene S Speizer, William A Zule, Tara Carney, Felicia A Browne, Jacqueline Ndirangu, Wendee M Wechsberg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilene S SpeizerUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
William A ZuleRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Tara CarneySouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Felicia A BrowneRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jacqueline NdiranguRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Wendee M WechsbergUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Electronic address: wmw@rti.org.
RTI International · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Venue-Based Recruitment and HIV Prevention for AOD Using Couples in South AfricaR01AA018076 · NIAAA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI WECHSBERG, WENDEE M · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018076NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSouth Africa continues to experience new HIV infections, with the highest risk among Black Africans living in poor communities. Most HIV prevention interventions target women or men separately and only a small number target couples jointly.

objectiveThis study examines varying strategies to engage women and men around HIV prevention and improved couple interactions.

methodsThe study comprises three arms: (1) a couple-based intervention delivered to women and men jointly; (2) women and men both offered a gender-focused intervention that is delivered to them separately; and (3) an intervention offered to women only and their male partners receive standard HIV testing and counseling (comparison arm). Between June 2010 and April 2012, men were identified in and around drinking establishments in a large disadvantaged community in Cape Town and asked to participate in the study if they drink regularly, had recent unprotected sex with their partner, and have a female partner who was willing to participate in the study.

resultsA total of 299 couples completed the baseline assessment and 276 were included in the analysis of sexual risk, partner communication, conflict resolution, and gender norm outcomes at baseline and six-month follow-up. Couples that participated in the couple-level intervention and couples where both partners received the intervention separately had better couple-level gender norms than couples in the comparison arm (women only receive intervention). Further, couples in the couple-level intervention and the both partners exposed separately arms were more likely to have the man only report consistent condom use than neither partner report consistent condom use than couples in the comparison arm.

conclusionCommunity-based HIV prevention intervention programs need to consider strategies to engage women and men and, if feasible, reach both partners jointly. Couple-level interventions are promising to improve gender norms and subsequently improve health outcomes, including reduced HIV risk among women, men, and couples.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityInterpersonal RelationsRisk-TakingAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSouth AfricaCoupleCouple conflictGender normsHIV preventionPartner communicationSexual risk behaviorSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID29843074
PMCPMC6467466
OpenAlexW2803696715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.